Profile of SeismicSquall

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 156

General Information
Register Time: 7 Apr 2015, 19:17 PM


Thread: USF Against HMG12 Jul 2015, 04:51 AM Can someone please tell me how to counter HMGs in buildings and bunkers in T1 as USF? Getting to T3/T2 is already a loss since you coulndt gain any ground in T1. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: The noob factor10 Jul 2015, 17:05 PM only agree that axis MGs are unbalanced towards U.S.F only, as they dont have anything to get MGs out of buildings or bunkers in T1(like snipers of mortars). And especially if you gambled fuel on smoke nades, which really only help with MGs outside of emplacements, that will set you back big time. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Can we plz fix the Rifle nade?4 Jul 2015, 03:21 AM On a few occasions wiped squads with >90% health. How can you nerf molotovs but not this? It bottles the mind. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New USF strategy? 3 Jul 2015, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2015, 11:37 AMcomm_ash USF will suffer a hefty micro tax until something is done to alleviate this design gap. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Anti-aircraft as area denial2 Jul 2015, 20:48 PM Just like original Command & Conquer (as GDI, singleplayer only). Sounds cool but why should plane-based globals get more of a disadvantage than non-plane-based globals? In: Lobby
Thread: Windows 10, anyone?5 Jun 2015, 19:18 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2015, 07:07 AMEsxile So should we install 10 or not? its going to be free for a month or so? Ahahaha. After reading the whole thread this just made me laugh - this really reflects how well this thread answered the original question. In: Hardware and Tech
Thread: How to deal with rifle nades7 May 2015, 13:54 PM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2015, 05:59 AMturbotortoise It's difficult, outright you have to think of the meta-game. If you aren't comfortable with dividing your attention harass with a stronger force, try taking the m20 with you. With that said, I find the counter to the rifle nade comes tertiary by denying them munitions, and if the Wehr player decides to nade, they risk a lot of things: no tellers, no lmgs, no shreks, no TWP, no fausts, no med bunker, etc. all very useful and without them your opponent is significantly weaker. Makes sense; I hadn't thought of that. Its just that animation is so subtle - hand nade is so much easier to dodge as the model puts his weapon away (clearly seen), spreads his arms out (clearly seen), not to mention the reduced range and the LARGE FONT timer. The rifle nade animation just has the model crouch a bit, which is freaking impossible to spot especially if they are overlapping each other or in a vertical row. This game I lost all of my rifle squads to only rifle nades. %50 precent of the time they weren't even called out so I didn't know a nade was coming until it hit the ground. Anyway I guess I have to build less infantry in that case as they just become a req drain and XP feeder. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to deal with rifle nades7 May 2015, 02:31 AM If I have 2 engagements simultaneously, 1 squad is going to die to a rifle grenade. 0 VS Seismic Squall Rifle grenade death by: SeismicSquall map: Kholodny Ferma 1 - In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rifle grenade death7 May 2015, 02:24 AM death by rifle nades In: Replays
Thread: M1 75mm Pack Howitzer vs mortar teams1 May 2015, 20:16 PM It seems like the howitzer always loses vs the mortar team (e.g ostheer) due to its apparently lower accuracy. Theoretically it could easily wipe the mortar team with a lucky shot, but I have never seen it shoot remotely accurately to perform something like that. Is the mortar team suppose to be a more accurate form of artillery, even though both have pretty much the same range? In: COH2 Gameplay