New USF strategy?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 1003

26 Jun 2015, 12:57 PMJustin xv

I've been struggling with double HMG's on certain maps, it gets very micro intensive as USF if the Ostheer player actually supports them.

I play only 3v3 and 4v4, now i try fast cap middle fuel point (most bigger maps have two middle fuel points) and building MG bunker with RE. Then fuel OP and sprint for Stuart. But the game for USF is on the edge. I'm enjoying the game as Axis much more now.

Posts: 1891

In light of new fighting pit use Infantry Compaby Riflemen defensive structures should get moved down in CP.

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

26 Jun 2015, 18:48 PMAradan

You lose your first and only one game as USF.

Why are you giving advice, if You do not know what you're talking about????

I do not like cowards, who just want an easy game for one side. No balls, no honor. Look at heroes as Luvnest, Siberian or Von Ivan. They want balanced game for all sides.

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned

oh you guys are gonna lose your only argument against me when I get top 100 with USF. So enjoy your little escape for now. ehehehehehe

Playercard of daspoulos

	2v2: P	streak: - 1
	2v2: P	streak: - 1
	2v2: P	streak: + 5
	2v2: P	streak: + 2

1337 h4X0R, dank memes

Multi Quote

Posts: 1003

26 Jun 2015, 19:02 PMQueenRatchet123

+1

Thank for support.

At the same i apologies Daspoulos. I am angry from this .... And please, start begin to love COH2.

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jesus i almost spit my drink out when you called twitch streamers heroes

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

Moved to US Forces Strategies

Posts: 1891

Ostheer requires high unit density to perform well. The .50 cal is an excellent way of exploiting this. Have enemy MG42s suppress your troops, and then flank with a .50 or two. Have Rifles in the rear ready to mop up.

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

I've actually found that with USF, the 1v1 gameplay hasn't changed too much. In a 1v1, you usually have plenty of flanking routes to exploit, and can do well without being forced into particular builds.

2v2s on the other hand are a lot harder vs. Double ost. Best thing to do is vetoed mg maps like crossing and minsk. Infantry company, rifle company, and recon company seem to be the best for obvious reasons.

UnfortUnfortUnfortunatly, indirect fire is the name of the game, and USF will suffer a hefty micro tax until something is done to alleviate this design gap.

Playercard of comm_ash

	1v1: P	streak: - 1
	1v1: P	streak: + 11
	1v1: P	streak: + 8
	1v1: P	streak: + 9

Multi Quote

Posts: 334

2 Jul 2015, 11:37 AMcomm_ash

I've actually found that with USF, the 1v1 gameplay hasn't changed too much. In a 1v1, you usually have plenty of flanking routes to exploit, and can do well without being forced into particular builds.

2v2s on the other hand are a lot harder vs. Double ost. Best thing to do is vetoed mg maps like crossing and minsk. Infantry company, rifle company, and recon company seem to be the best for obvious reasons.

UnfortUnfortUnfortunatly, indirect fire is the name of the game, and USF will suffer a hefty micro tax until something is done to alleviate this design gap.

+1.