I'd be more for the grenade side tech being cheaper so it isn't such a resource drain. It used to be worth it when rifles got the smoke but now since it's on 2-3 squads typically Itd be better if they got a price reduction to reflect its current strength.
As it is now 90% of games as USF you will not be able to spend that additional resources early that will delay tech or rifles. Since USF has such a fragile balance in the early game anyways the current price of USF nades isnt worth it imo.
Exacly I like current state its good change that rifleman have only granades and officers and re smokes but this side tech its too much ambu and granades upgrade cost u so much that i only bulid ambu and rush for jackson. Anyway granade upgrade should cost 10 or 15 fuel. |
Thats what Sander also suggested. I like your idea a lot! You have to choose between fast tech or a strong fighting unit.
221 and m20 should arive in same time they are similar units. So currently 221 is in good spot. Okw tier 1 is cheaper than usf tier 1 so teoricaly 221 should be faster on field than m20. By the way why grayhound is cp5? In team games cp5 is sometimes when u have major already |
I just switched OP's post with Riflemen. Am i a balance forum Expert now?
Riflemen are disgustingly good, need toning down!
They are too cheap, too spammble, consistent damage, they throw those Frag grenades like pro baseball players, plus they make the entire garrison/cover play style look like a joke and toward mid-late game are like terminators. Either do something about the BAR upgrade/Frag nade or make them more expensive to reinforce and call it a day.
pathetic |
Commandos might as well receive the Stormtrooper treatment, spawning at full strength but with rifles with a free upgrade to Stens. This would solve all problems at once. No ludicrous MP cost, no cheesy retreat wipes. Infiltrating behind enemy lines at full strength (upgrading to Stens) would require planning and cunning.
Sounds cool |
Regarding Sanders proposal to give Overwatch the JT too:
- Wehrmacht has 2 Ele docs and 5 Tiger docs (icl. Tiger Ace)
- Soviets have 2 SU-15s docs, 2 IS-2 docs + 2 KV-2 docs (incl. new Urban Defense), + several docs providing KV-1 / T-34/85
- Brits will have 3 Croc docs (incl. new Tactical support)
WHY SHOULD OKW DOESN'T HAVE 2 DOCS WITH THE JT?
because jt is cancer in teamgames so no thx |
|
I suggest this before just delete lefh from this commander and we gut. U want lefh ? Then pick overwatch doctrine simple. Because fortifications + heavy artilery is op as fak |
I agree with Vipper that the USF mech has been stuffed with far too many abilities and units. It's insane, so insane TwistedTootsy will be rank 1 USF lvl if this goes live.
Incediryround  and viper two coh2 experts
This commander is decent actualy because these units are situational only noob use all of them in same time. Anyway Usf need lategame commanders so thats the reason they buff sherman 76. |
|
Just delete lefh from okw defensive commander this commander give u too much especialy in 4vs4.. okw dont need 2 commanders with lefh |
Thread: OKW UP?27 Sep 2018, 21:37 PM
I play all Armies equally, well, except for the Soviets since I don't like communists but that's another matter...
yeah i know what u mean i dont like communists too but nazis are ok so i play okw
Edit: im sorry that im use word not allowed to watch for german ppl |
But is guess "flank speed", "step on it", "war speed" and other similar abilities...should work both forward and backwards.
Yes  finnaly u say something constructive heh |
Relic Entertainment
