Profile of kafrion

Good to hear

Thank you both for taking the time to give me advice ( better late than never i guess )

I tried to combine your advice , that is symbiosis's agressive way and naeras's conservative m8 , and what i did was , a 2 engie 4 rifles stall ,after i got my 1 st cp i picked inf rhs and combined mines and wire with the riflestalling , a couple of engegements and kabooms later vet 1 started to flow in , then i went for bars and created choke points of wire , and then i got my m8 and an atg , long story short my m8 cleared the mgs and sweeprs away , he could not take me in medium range so he used lots of munitions on mp40s and started charging me but stationary vet 1 bared rifles seem to hold just fine , plus that the mp drain and overusage delayed his pak , the whole game culminated in an epic volk charge that costed me no squads and gave me 2 vet 2 rifles afterwards he quited since he lost 3 volks or sth

1 question , why is the wehr mortar superior to the us ? it does not make a lot of sense to give an army campy structure , the best late game , all the counters they need by t2 , and superior early counters to anti campy units as well , its like a loophole . To get a better understanding of what i am saying imagine if the us sniper as he is and the wehr one with larger range (without any vet) , would that not be stupid ?

I am almost ashamed of what i will say but EAs handling of generals 2 in the public relations department is way more ''liberal'' and perhaps better at creating hype than this radio silence than the one employed for coh2

It's a bonus for organizing events, which currently is a pain in the butt in vCoH.
If you've ever tried to help organize one of the tournaments in that game, or even play in one of them, you know what I'm talking about.

Nobody is ever going to say that bo1 is a better format for competitive play than bo3 or bo5; it isn't. But for earlier rounds in tournaments, you can usually do with one round and save everyone volunteering for a lot of work, especially if you've done a good job seeding the players.

Since its an event organized by volunteers its whatever you decide and noone can or should say otherwise , however the initial discussion which i was talking about was if it is good for the competitive potential of the game which comes at the quar semis and finals not organizing competitions , but i still believe that a bo2 with vp lead deciding the winner in a tie is still a lot better than bo1 and if you spread it over 2 days on different times according to each timezone then perhaps it would take a lot of the strain away , also the choice of opponents needs to be done deliberately based on the skill in order not to have to big names being disqualified because they lost 1 game to another big name . Another thing as i said before is that mirror matches need absolute symmetry in maps to work and they only show ability to play one faction (so imo you need 2 mirror matches (sov-sov , osth-osth)in the same map to get the best result possible) , while that may be enough if you know the skill of the competitors in order to seed them it will work only at the qualification rounds and only after you know the skill of each player individually which will take a long time imo , One question however do you supervise all the matches played in the qualification round like in the rest how is this thing done ?

Skill is how effectively players use their units and resources to win the game. I didn't argue that top level players who master several armies are without skill, I suggested that the current skill level of the top vCoH players suffers because of their need to play at least 2 factions.

Disaggree , in order to play competitive coh in a tournament you need a very good grasp of all the factions frequented , personally the more i play pe the better i play against them because i get better forsight in teching choices , pathing and positioning that the opponent might do having done them myself , having experts of only one faction will only dumb down the term , it would only hurt the competitive aspect of the game .

Another thing to consider , matchups are heavilly influenced by the map so there is no real choice of what you r good at its what the map favors most , and if we play at a symmetrical map then its like forcing you to play the mirror match , creating in turn the one faction or mirror match experts .