Profile of RedT3rror

Jump back to quoted post23 May 2017, 22:50 PMsiuking666

I still dont understand why there is no German campaign, ever. (tales of valor dont count because it's ridiculously short)

Jump back to quoted post13 May 2017, 23:21 PMvoltardark

A polish commander coming with new polish units; (Cavalry,why not)

Jump back to quoted post8 May 2017, 07:50 AMSiphon X.

Recently I played a 4v4 and when checking the ranks of my opponents after the match on the official leaderboards I found to my surprise that they had no game listed as 4v4 with random guys. However, they also had no games as 4v4 AT. However, three of the players in the 4v4 apparently were in the same 3s team. That got me thinking:

When I create a team with 3 people, me included and queue for a 4v4, does this count as random 4v4 or as 3s team? For some reason I assumed the former, but the observation above indicated the latter; which would have funny consequences, like, you could get on top of the 2s team ladder by never playing a 2v2 but instead rocking 4v4s with your mate.

Does anybody know if that's the case or do I have to force some poor fellows to try this out?

Jump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 19:03 PMMarowi

I think it is fine that Axis have excellent late-game vehicle synergy. That is not actually the issue.

Jump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 19:03 PMMarowi

The issue is that they have no real other alternative to that style of play. Thus, nerfing one or both halves of that synergy only really serves to nerf the faction as a whole, creating imbalance.

Jump back to quoted post5 May 2017, 19:03 PMMarowi

Allied, likewise, don't really opt for armor because their heavy tanks are too weak comparatively (IS-2s, KV-2s, and especially KV-1s are very rare sights on the battlefield these days). As I said above, the better course is to create viable alternatives to these dominant playstyles, rather than nerf them directly. I think doing so will simply create frustrating experiences for players, particularly those on the Axis side.