Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Fixing The Issues With Vet 3 Infantry Sections8 Apr 2016, 01:47 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2016, 01:39 AMSvanh The problem with that is that the Brens are probably tuned to be used in pairs. The LMG42, for example, has more long-range DPS than the Tommy Bren both absolutely and as a percentage increase in squad DPS (LMG42: ~+50%, Bren: ~+25%). Does that include the cover bonus? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stormtrooper g43+shrek8 Apr 2016, 01:20 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2016, 01:16 AMLeChimp Same for pathfinders and Tommies. Hope Relic will fix this soon, cuz right now it is a bad idea to equip better weapons for all those squads. Well, still worth it for Paths since they'll shrek with better AI weapons. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: current state of wermacht g43?7 Apr 2016, 22:28 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 21:22 PMd0ggY because they fire on the move, right? G43's on grens are still worth it imo, gives you a bit more of a mobile combat than the lmg42 They also over triple max-range DPS. I like G43s just fine myself, but it's kinda hard to discount why I'm still just seeing LMG42s everywhere. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: current state of wermacht g43?7 Apr 2016, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 19:04 PMMyself No to make PG more cost affective and G43 on them a better option.... PGs are cost-effective already, and I'd prefer keeping a good AI unit without a necessary upgrade in their repertoire as is. Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 20:11 PMelchino7 On PG, it's a downgrade in all situations. On Grens, it's an upgrade in all situations. So are LMG42s though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Capture Points 7 Apr 2016, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 18:21 PMthedarkarmadillo yea, i know it takes time im just busting their balls about the forum haha (which even 2 weeks was a long time for a migration and STILL has things being added as it goes) Yeah I dunno what that was about. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Capture Points 7 Apr 2016, 16:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 16:01 PMthedarkarmadillo its pretty obvious to see tho that when you cant tell the difference between 2 weeks and 4 months some problems would likely come up when trying to pull a balance patch together Game Developer Time is a serious problem, don't mock it Really though I've seen complaints like that in just about any game's community that I pay attention to, so I'm willing to give devs the benefit of the doubt in most cases at this point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: HOW to FIX MG's in this game7 Apr 2016, 15:37 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 15:36 PMBlalord Who cares when the non AP rapes infantry like no other MG's Bad options should either be removed or made good, all there is to it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: HOW to FIX MG's in this game7 Apr 2016, 15:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 15:29 PMBlalord What is the problem with Dshk again ? Seems fine to me aside from how the AP rounds are trayush. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: current state of wermacht g43?7 Apr 2016, 13:23 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 02:29 AMTobis Is this sarcasm? Because it's worse than Stg44 at every practical range. It's better at like range 30 Out of the 35 range StG44s can shoot up to By 32% So yeah, probably not worth it unless your enemy is spamming mortars for some reason. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What do you think about balance in CoH27 Apr 2016, 00:09 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2016, 22:05 PMCarlos Danger Ostheer is the best designed and most balanced faction imo. No overperforming units save the Sniper (not vs. Soviets though) and probably Ostruppen. It's just that the other factions have issues. Been like that since vanilla release... In: COH2 Balance