All i am saying is that the maxim had generally not very many positives when compared to the 42,
I say this from a design standpoint (Gotta give the maxim some credit it came 32 years before the 42)
And also from personal experience of firing both guns on a semi regular basis (About twice a year)
Yes, for actual gameplay, it would be difficult to both accurately represent the Maxim and give it advantages since its advantages were more for personal and logistical matters that the game would never hope to model (because who the hell wants their HMG crew to change water or barrels too?).
One could argue its lower fire-rate could justify its better single-target suppression with some modern findings that accurate fire is far more effective at suppressing experienced troops than less accurate and higher volumes of fire, but that would be a lot more arguable since accuracy would still come down to the gunner using it.