Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: USF is horribly designed20 Oct 2015, 02:13 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 01:56 AMBeefSurge I think LT is kind of a beefed up Rifle squad that adds early game pressure. Really though I just think his abilities should be more flavorful. (Maybe some kind of recon with binoculars, or calling in a mortar strike, or drawing enemy fire or something. Just one more thing would be fine by me. Kinda wondered if some sort of sprint ability would be fitting for the LT to counteract the enemy's position, with his tier generally having a more mobile feel over the Captain. In full - in my fevered dreams, he'd have "Flanking Maneuver", usable on himself or another infantry squad to improve their speed for a short time at the cost of increasing their received accuracy a lot while they're moving, preventing the squad from running around an open field to facehug their intended target but allowing squads to flank around. I really do mean "short time" to prevent the ability from working too good at chasing down retreating squads constantly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF is horribly designed20 Oct 2015, 01:48 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 01:43 AMBeefSurge I think that officers could be more unique, and T0 could have more variety in units somehow. (Like a jeep or light mortar or something.) Other than those two things USF is actually really well designed Cap's interesting enough already, Major could be interesting if any of his munition abilities were actually anywhere near good , LT is boredom though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New unit idea: NKVD Border Guards19 Oct 2015, 23:46 PM Even with the Soviets' base tiers being around a much earlier time in the war than the other factions, I think the Border Guards would be too early even for that. In: Lobby
Thread: Star Wars Battlefront: Thoughts and Opinions18 Oct 2015, 21:28 PM I was interested but the $50 DLC season pass before the game even released ain't right. I get DLC can be made after the main game is basically complete and then awaits release, but apparently $50+ worth of content is planned to be made after the game comes out already? Plan an Xpac instead. In: Other Games
Thread: Assault engineers18 Oct 2015, 05:51 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 05:29 AMAchtAchter If you buff them assault grenadiers will also need a buff as they cost the same. AEs are definitely the less-bad of the two by far what with being able to repair and lay down demo charges, though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV Penetration18 Oct 2015, 00:08 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 23:26 PMIrishHitman79 I think the unit is fine in every aspect for the role it plays. When used right its a beast on the battlefield but its not very hard to take out also. Its one of the few units that is very rewarding to use, by giving the player great Vet ability's for the effort of Mirco he puts it. The Vet 1 ability is fine, with its very low profile. All I ask is a few more Bulletins for it. The vet ability is fine unless someone activates in combat to suddenly become invisible while actively engaged in combat and drop attack orders against it forcing its enemies to suddenly micro attack-ground. That is why the vet ability needs nerfs. Also 'cause, ya know, a tank suddenly becoming invisible while you shoot at it is the silliest thing ever. I'd gladly accept another buff to the ability in compensation if necessary, frankly always thought the JPIV should have an actual hold fire button instead of just target vehicles only so it can really get a good jump on something instead of shooting the moment the gun faces a vehicle. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV Penetration17 Oct 2015, 21:37 PM JPIV is already good and a significant buff like that is unnecessary. Frankly, its vet ability needs nerfs with its ability to Predator-cloak in combat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Flak Defenses17 Oct 2015, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 19:20 PMslother Get your facts right before posting. They dont shoot down p47s after 1 strafe. AA base weapon got nerfed ages ago: Isn't it like there's a small chance of shooting down the aircraft for every shot against it? So theoretically, that could happen, but if it does, clearly RNGesus just really hates you and your entire family? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KNOW YOUR COMMANDERS - OKW17 Oct 2015, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 16:16 PMThatRabidPotato Radio Intercept Soviet Industry Thorough Salvage (that one's in this commander!) Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 07:14 AMStrummingbird Radio Intercept I'd argue that Radio Intercept actually can change your gameplay pretty significant despite being completely passive with the warnings it gives toward enemy strategic choices, not something like, say, passive Zeal. Soviet Industry as well (...which is why no one likes it because you are no longer allowed to take model losses at CP 3 because fuck you apparently). Thorough Salvage actually is "Totally same but better", but even that requires a bit of active effort to smash up vehicles and then salvage them (possibly requiring repositioning so the enemy doesn't deny them to you) which can affect your strategic munition expenditures unlike Recoup Losses being passive which would quite definitely be "So you basically just don't lose as much manpower from combat, spam MP harder". Nonetheless, good responses. I'd just be sure Recoup Losses being passive would be a definite new bar in lowness in gameplay provided by commander segments. In: Lobby
Thread: KNOW YOUR COMMANDERS - OKW17 Oct 2015, 06:20 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2015, 05:34 AMbroodwarjc Is Recoup Losses muni-activated for a short time period or passive once you hit the CPs? The muni-activaed ones suck. I'm assuming the first since CoH2's commander segments have been entirely without completely passive effects. The passives give you upgrades or build options - nothing has been just "Play the exact same way except now your stats are better". In: Lobby