Profile of Kryptic

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 61 | Subs: 2

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/KrypticRTS
Game Name: Kryptic


Thread: Need Feedback for OKW2 Sep 2016, 16:51 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2016, 16:00 PMKpen97 I would say its just a learn to play issue here I would say your face is a learn to play issue Kappa In: Replays
Thread: Need Feedback for OKW2 Sep 2016, 13:10 PM Played this match on Langreskaya, i always find this map such a stuggle vs USF. Was a exciting match tho, fun to watch aswell I know i lost my t4 under the pressure of rifleman, i just don't know how to counter rifle spam + mortar + stuart. The gap between the stuart timing and the p4/other tank for OKW is too big. 1 raketten is too slow and i can't invest more in AT because the rifleman will wreck my infantry otherwise, MG's don't make sense since 1 or 2 mortars just wipe them in a second.... Feel so hopeless playing okw sometimes. If anyone has a alternative build, feedback or a high level replay for me with OKW i'd appreciate that. In: Replays
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.30 Aug 2016, 17:30 PM Hahah exactly, lets settle this like men. We don't need rational arguements. We do a 1v1 duel and whoever wins it wins the arguement! im choosing Findeeds side... Raketten not OP! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.30 Aug 2016, 16:39 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2016, 16:03 PMaaa i like how noobs claim shit about stun forgeting that if they nerf this stun they likely to nerf all axis stuns too. At least it would be fair. That's not entirely true. The axis stuns take some time to aim before they fire and cost quite alot fo munis. if the stuart also had to stand still and take like 2 seconds to aim before firing the stun shot, i'd be comepletly fine with it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.30 Aug 2016, 12:41 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2016, 12:10 PMEarth Don't take Latch's sayings seriously guys, he doesn't even play OKW... I mean how can you say something about a unit if you don't even play that in 1v1s... yeah no offense to latch, he is a nice guy, but i do agree with Earth on this one. I like opinions on this post but if you don't have much experiance and barely play the game and just hate on OKW, i think it's better to not say anything at all.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.30 Aug 2016, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2016, 00:18 AMLatch I'd take a rak over any allied AT gun any day. What you fail to sum up is just how broken an invisible at gun is, I'll say that again an INVISIBLE AT gun. "But its ROF is crap and it's rotation is poor" + other bullshit people throw out, whilst ignoring the fact that when the AT gun is invisible you can position it in such a way it doesn't need to rotate for the second shot. The first shot is a fucking surprise, you can't see it coming, by the time you realise it, a second shot has hit. Anyone that thinks the rak isn't good needs to watch/rewatch barton Vs Wada and learn how broken an invisible AT gun actually is. You're coming off very strong with your opinion latch, but i do not agree. You're saying a raketten is OP and easily deals with early armor, i don't think this is true at all. First of all a Stuart is always faster than the raketten, so it can just kite around the map without ever being shot. Second reason is the Stuart needs (3!) shots of the raketten to die, even my grandmother would be fast enough to micro the stuart out of a engament before it takes 3 shots, providing all shots hit in the first place. 3rd reason is the raketten is very fragile, and under the enourmous pressure of the USF it's diffecult to keep it alive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.30 Aug 2016, 08:04 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2016, 21:13 PMsherlock I did a quick count. If my count is correct those were 3 deflects and 3 misses. The only reason the p4 died was because its front armour was facing the wrong way the whole time. A really well executed flank and severely overextended p4 killed the p4 as it should have. I don't think there is anything wrong with this scene. That doesn't make the stuart okay but the prevailing consensus is that the performance against infantry not against vehicles is too good. If that really is the way you see it, and ''don't think there is anything wrong with this scene'' i'm not even going in discussion with you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stuart light tank needs a change.29 Aug 2016, 20:36 PM Hello forum people, So i played this match on semoisky vs USF, mainly want to focus on the Stuart here. I just think it's a badly designed unit and why isn't it being changed? I usually don't post anything about balance but this really wenta step to far. Video example of what happend: https://youtu.be/Js32btou1nU?t=1385 Alright so my questions are: Even tho this case was on the real armor of the p4, Why can the Stuart 37mm penetrate so well on medium tanks, it even works on heavys? It's already a stuggle holding on vs USF when playing OKW, luchs is no option so you're forced to go for t2 medic truck. Since you do this you have to hold of the Stuart light tank for a while without armor of your own, giving the OKW a disadvantage. When you finally have enough for a P4 the stuart is still way to effective, everytime it gets into trouble it just uses a stun around and my p4 gets completely shut down for a moment rendering it useless. Another thing that happend (can be seen in the Video example) The vet 2 stuart crew just runs up to my p4, insta repairs the broken engine (which is just not the way it should work imo) and rides back to base. And for some reason the p4 he just stole is isntantly vet 2 aswell, how does this even make sense???? seriously.... I would like opinions of others on this matter, Thanks for taking the time to read, cheers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For Relic6 Jul 2016, 13:44 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 21:02 PM__deleted__ This game I played against opponent that had offensive name (I think his name is against all gaming companies codex because it is racist name) and then was also offensive thorough match (I don´t think praying someone that his family members should die because you flank his mg is alright). Also he thinks, he get unpunished and I hardly believe he is this offensive in other game too ,becuase except playing better than him I was hardly offensive against him except pointing at his rather agressive game nickname (because I found his name offensive, btw I´m european). Hope he can get something like 1-2 week exemplary ban , so he star being more polite and I think this can also help a lot this comunity if they see they get punished for bad language and offensive name. Hector Jup i've had it before a few times aswell, pretty sad if you get this angry over a videogame :/ In: Replays
Thread: (Tutorial) The most viable 3 soviet commanders4 Jul 2016, 14:24 PM In my opinion Guard Motor doctrine is still the best all round soviet doctrine out there. Got the Guards for light AT + pin ability. Good vs infantry and diffecult to take them out 120mm mortar for the late game squad wipes when you really struggle vs high veterancy squads. Mark Target to deal with heavy axis armor t34/85 the best all round firepower the soviets have. But the effectiveness also depends on the playstyle of the user ofcourse. In: Strategy Desk