Profile of achpawel

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1351

General Information


Thread: Raketens are too good15 Mar 2020, 19:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2020, 14:31 PMWiderstreit Raketenwerfer is so cheap, because Faust is locked behind tech. Change that and Püppchen can be changed/nerfed etc. Beside, there is no need for lock Volk's faust behind tech. It has less range than Ostheer's version and every dive-in e.g. with early carrier is something shouldn't happen. Why not simply change Volks with Panzerfüsiliere? With some adjustements. -> 1st Panzerfüseliers are worse in close-combat than Volks, so Sturmgrens role get more clear. 2nd AT-rifle-nade is worse than Faust (DPS) so alliies early verhicles get higher chance to flee than versus Ostheer. 3rd. with UHU-change search-rife-nade would fill the role of old UHU. For me it looks like better desighned line-up. I'm not sure - imo the oppressive level of OKW infantry advantage early game should be balanced by their lack of early game AT. I'd make racketenwerfer 320 just to make sure OKW can't keep buing so many infantry units early game. Lookin at current puppchen stats that seems more than fair. I'd never use ostheer as an example here as overall army strenth of ostheer vs OKW is extremely different. Ostheer is simply so much less effective that their faust seems to be a really necessay stopgap AT measure early game (they build a structure to get grens in the first place and they need to tech and build another structure to get the pak) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good13 Mar 2020, 13:14 PM rak is just too cheap for what you get atm In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.312 Mar 2020, 21:34 PM Good changes. 25% capping speed is actually a very clever way of retaining 4 men squads and making it work. It addresses the problem or 'risky' capping for ost under fire. Very often you are forced to risk losing a squad and finish capping or retreat it before you finish capping. Because of 4 men squads you have less time to cap because you will lose models more quickly than allied or OKW infantry. This change may make it even - squads will need similar time to cap before retreating. It also somehow helps to balance USF capping crews and officer speed boosts with get etc. It also helps with packhowie wipes etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good12 Mar 2020, 20:42 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 20:02 PMLago The Raketenwerfer is a little good for what you pay for now. 55m isn't that big a disadvantage over 60m, and the 5 man squad's done wonders for its survivability. Throw retreat on top of that, and you've got a really good AT unit. It could stand to be 320 MP like the other ATGs now. Exactly In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?8 Mar 2020, 11:22 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 10:06 AMT.R. Stormjäger Neither, give it more accuracy so it can actually hit the target and it’s fine. Another good idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?8 Mar 2020, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2020, 08:34 AMoootto92 Brumbär rarely sees action in 1v1 due to current shittierT4 meta. In team games in it's current state Brumbär plays most of the time like a brawler because that seems to be what relic tries to make out of it. But it really isn't fit for this role: The time you get Brumbär out enemy has already enough AT out to effectively render it useless as a brawler. It also lacks the armor and health to effectively do this job. You just have to milk overextending infantry to get to that VET1 and still this isn't enough to outrange the AT guns. My proposition for brumbär would be to make it more like M8 scott, the differences following and being loyal to faction desing: -Remove brumbär ability to shoot while on the move -notably increase the firing range mirroring the m8 scott ranges -decrease armor, health and mobility This way Brumbär would actually become what it should be: Powerful long range assault gun that can rain down some hurt on pinned enemies and fortified positions. But without clever management and support Allies can snipe it as easily as axis can snipe m8 scotts. Another good option imo In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?7 Mar 2020, 21:13 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 20:38 PMSvalbard SD Or give it switchable AP/HE shells like the Sherman ability? Should be less effective with its HE than the Sherman/Tiger but still be able to do decent work when it faces infantry. One of the good options. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5CP Puma is way too late7 Mar 2020, 21:11 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 21:06 PMKatitof You can use that argument about literally any kind of hardcounter and unit it hardcounters. And it still doesn't change the fact that one unit counters another. Puma is also anything but fragile. 1 in 25 small arms shots will pen it, other then that, you need same level of AT you'd need to kill T-70 if you want to get rid of it, except you can't use vehicles, because it counters them. But vacuum comparisons are simply wrong, which You mentioned in this thread yourself. My argument is that ostheer's puma will be less supported by at infantry weapons than t70 plus it will not hurt sov infantry. There is no reason to make it 5 cps. 4 cps would be fine IMO, especially when it is a doctrine tied vehicle. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5CP Puma is way too late7 Mar 2020, 21:03 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 20:45 PMKatitof And jackson is not a hardcounter to P4.... Anymore silly statements to drop? You mentioned vacuum before. The amount of at on sov infantry makes a fragile puma have hard time, especially after at guns are out. You really have to be a good player to make it work. Please don't pick statements out of context. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5CP Puma is way too late7 Mar 2020, 20:00 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2020, 19:55 PMLago GCS2's Mobidef meta is why. ?? In: COH2 Balance