|
To be really honest, Ostheer requres thouse commanders reworks the most. While Soviet has obliviously best commanders compare to other factions, by that I mean that while they have some clearly the most usefull ones, aside from a few, they all can be used effectively.
Fun fact, while soviets DLC commanders, thouse ones which were added after launch of the game, are kinda meh after all changes. Ostheers best commanders are the ones from post launch DLCs. Their original commanders are really shitty. While in community guide all factions has T1, T2 ect commanders, only Ostheer has ones that you clearly wont use at all. |
I know there were blacks in the Wehrmacht, even the SS had Islamic divisions. The German army of ww2 was anything but the racist thing it is made out to be.
But still, the black female wehrmacht soldier just goes too far man. It would be the same as making another WW2 campaign about the 101st and having a female brigade running around purely for the social righteousness'
Well you have a point, but from my point of view having black female werhmacht soldier is so ridiculous that, you would rather see it more like a kinda of joke or just you know silly thing.
I dont know, tbh, because as I said, its optional. I mean, alright why we have soviets fighting along side americans, or why there are soldiers running in winter camo in CoD and so on. CoD was never possitioning itself and an immersive and historically accurate game. Even campain has like only 1 sub-main character who black and it was shown that rascism was a normal thing at this time period, but they fought together and bla bla bla. Well at least this makes kinda sence.
And in the end, as I said its optional, sure it would break the immersion, but NOONE forcing you to play as black female, that they key point. You are given the option here.
While BF has completly different story. They made the most popular role (snipairs) to represent minorities for german\british army its blacks, for russians army its women. And its not optional, you forced to accept it and play as them AND they are the most popular role AND only scouts (aka snipers) has iconic weapons and only they can somehow give you ww1 feeling running around with bolt-action rifle. |
Black female Wehrmacht soldiers. You kidding me?
At very least CoD gave players option to pick their character. They didnt force you to play male\female, black or white. It was up to player.
Now look at BF1, where Dice FORCED you to play as Black german sniper or where British army has only 1 actually british soldier as Support.
I'm not protecting CoD, but at least in CoD it was a customisation part more then tolerance propaganda, while in BF1 its clear tolerance agenda aswell as re-writing history (yes, video games are not the best place to learn history but still it would have influence on some ppl) because british army has like 90% actuall british soldiers in europe, aswell as German didnt have blacks in europe and aswell Russians didnt have army of wemens.
But hey, I woudnt be surpriced if we would have Blacks as SS soldiers, during battle for the moscow, where both germans are russians would use Sherman tanks and thompsons.
P.S. there was blacks during WW2 in German army, so thats why we would most likely see them, le lol
There are some female sovet snipers in COH2 because there were some female Soviet snipers in WW2. ---> No one complains.
There are MALE and FEMALE snipers and tank crews. Feel the difference. If Dice gave us optiotion to pick Black or white german sniper aswell as british, there would be only like few ppl who would complain. |
|
As far as I know, if you double T34\76 and focus one squad with both of them, their frontal MGs would just melt this squad in few seconds, like vet 5 obersts. |
Tbh Iam asking if the Luftwaffe Groundforces is good tho.
Its still a bad doctrine tho. Especially at 3vs3 or higher.
Fallschirmjäger are still glass cannons.
They are playing a Support role tho and dont perform like Obers. Seriously I Need some advise with this doctrine. Like Building order or when in General you should take this doctrine at all.
They are supporting unit yes, at the same time they are awaible earlier then obersts aswell if you wanna go T1+T2 with pumas and skin T3, you really need some sort of inf which shooting bullets not pop-corn like volksgrenadiers.
But in general, their commander is kinda meh tbh. Better to stick up with Panzerfusiliers, since they are by far best OKW inv via damage and cost effectivness. |
And add a option for my squads to automatically retreat once they are down to one model while you are at it. thanks relic
Well, I like your sercasm, but if you think that artifical depth of the game via "press attack and then press stop" is better then having one specific button for such move is better.
Not to mention that this is quite retarded, how many players in general should know about that. If you turn on your logic, then pressing attack and then pressing stop, in the mind of normal human being would most likely mean "stop last order compleatly", not "derp keep attacking but dont chase"
Not saying its hard to do and not even saying adding this option is nessesry, but replying with sarcasm in context "wow, this is such oblivious thing and good thing" is kinda retarded.
There are many QoL changes but by your sarcasm this has to be considering as l2p  Why?
This is pro-coh2 leage misterminds, ones they were raped by some design flaws and they want everyone to expirience this as well.
|
|
Pretty much title.
I think game really need an option for armor to prevent it from chasing units you ordered to attack.
I, personally, lost so much of my armor, because for me coh2 has like 0.5 second deley between my orders, and as british for excample, with their insanly fast tanks, its usually critical. |
I don't understand ? How on earth is coh2 not a profitable game ?
It's not as profitable as let's say csgo or dota 2 but c'mon it makes/has made a lot of money for relic.
Even though the game is far from perfect it has evolved plenty since release and relic are doing a far better job now than they used to do in 2013.
I think the game is growing, and coh3 if it ever comes out will be a huge success.
RTS may be a dead genre but it has a dedicated and hardcore fanbase and any dev would be stupid not to capitalize on that.
And how it is profitable? Sure it has DLC but in general profits are no doubt very low, considering avarage 5k online and after free giveaways 10k online, now it dropped back to 5k online.
All DLC content for original factions were released during first\first and a half year after the innitial release.
Then WFA arrived, with 3 default and like 4-5 DLC commanders.
British forces had 5 DLC commanders.
Thats pretty much it. Commanders was the only thing ppl really cared about, now we have only camos, not even single player content.
In this regard, coh2 was profitable, but its no doubt it barrely made a lot of money. Its simply not worth time and effort updating it. All updated and content, were so rare not because relic is lazy, but because profits are so low, you can consider new content as a gift for a community. |
And this is an issue because...?
Its not an issue if this was your questing, game exp works like this.
If your question is why it would be an issue, then it would be because your panthers would just feed enemy AT units vet.
I'm just pointing you that your option is not really a good idea. |
That's why nerfing armor/range and boosting hp pool and moving/stationary accuracy would succesfully revitalize tier 4 and okw panther.
Do you understand that giving its health and less armor, would also boost enemy ability to vet up tanks\AT units?
Units dont get exp for non-penetrated shots, while due to panther cost, more HP and less amor means insane amount of exp. Thats why Heavy TDs are so easy to vet-up if Brits had gone into churchils. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
