Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: A new solution to the Volksblob Issue12 Feb 2015, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 15:11 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf I think the Stuka needs a small adjustment of its vet requirements (maybe 10% less). The Sturmtiger also needs to reach vet faster (maybe 20%). These changes, however, have nothing to do with Volks/shrecks (like many already said). If you want to get rid of this bad design choice you have to: - Remove shrecks from Volks - Give Sturmpios double shrecks for 120MU - Give Volks Pzfausts (available once the first HQ is built; basically the same weapon Ostheer has for 25MU) + AI upgrades - Buff the Raketenwerfer (aim time, durability, maybe even a bit more range) I don't think any other change would fix the problem TBH. I would rather have a solution that doesn't make Ostheer and OKW early game pretty much the same. Not to mention the fact that the shrek problem would be even worse since it would be even easier to micro a shrek blob then. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A new solution to the Volksblob Issue12 Feb 2015, 16:47 PM I wonder how much longer it will be till literally every thread is about Volks and Shreks. Singularity soon fellow posters. If these worked, no one would whine about Volks Blob. Get a clue, and be less biaised. Iv used them and Iv seen them work, So have many excellent players. Have you see what a B4 shot does a horde of volks? fyi the explosion/impact from a B4 has a bigger damage radius than a railway artillery shell and there is no flares to warn your enemy. The OKW minesweeper also can't pick up democharges till it's way to late due to the minesweepers short range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New faction British??12 Feb 2015, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 13:44 PMImmoraliste Lol - a modern German faction would suck. They don't take defense seriously; hence, why they're on Russias doorstep, yet only spend 1.3% of GDP on defense, versus the NATO agreed prescription of 2%+. The only countries in Europe with any commitment to at least some level of high-end capability (i.e to fight a war vs a first world opponent, even for just long enough for the American cavalry to arrive) are France and the United Kingdom, even with their massive cut-backs in spending. But even these factions would just be optional commanders in COHx: Modern Warfare. They actually just began the design/production of a new tank line and are probably going to increase defense spending soon. But ultimately modern warfare COHx would have to be NATO fighting NATO because pretty much anyone else has an ever more joke of a military. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: A new solution to the Volksblob Issue12 Feb 2015, 07:55 AM A solution to the Volks blob exists, it's called the IS2/Democharge/AA HT/B4/120 mortar/Scott/Literally any indirect fire in the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okwunits12 Feb 2015, 07:53 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 05:47 AMOZtheWiZARD I beg to differ. Beside it is hard to argue with the nonsense you were writing in different topic. Again, you fail to actually provide anything concrete. And it's not hard to argue at all, you simply just don't want to put in either the effort or don't actually have anything to say. You said Obers its self are a "fine unit" saying that the lmg34 only makes them op Then i had to tell you u cant separate the weapon that Obers deploy with You obviously lack reading comprehension because I said "Obers would be perfectly fine if they didn't have the MG34", which is correct. With out the MG34 Obers are just a all round good infantry rifle unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okwunits12 Feb 2015, 01:13 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 00:31 AMAchtAchter Guys whas all with the playercard bashing? He has games from both sides while most people criticising him are allies only players,that hide their playercard. What Alexander says makes sense if you base it on team games. Puma is a beast in 1vs1 but a questionable choice in team games,e.g. Some okw units like the jgpz4 or uhu shine on certain maps and situations but can't be always considered a good choice. Like I said, I have already admitted I know units like the Puma are good at what they do. It's just that I have an issue when people say they are OP when counters do exist and people just aren't taking advantage of it. The best way to learn OKW's weakness is to play them, you will find all the gaps in their unit builds and how best to beat them pretty quick. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim Spam has to stop12 Feb 2015, 01:07 AM Calling anything spam is pointless in my opinion, since the game meta is so based around using a large amount of 1 or 2 types of units spamming cons is just as legit as spamming volks or riflemen. If there was a lot more unit choice than there would be a point to calling it spam, but when each faction only has a small about of viable units then nothing but spam versus spam is what you get. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: okwunits11 Feb 2015, 23:04 PM Fun fact: Every single post WFA balance problem, excluding the ones with Ostheer had root at OKW. And this will always never not be funny lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okwunits11 Feb 2015, 23:00 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 22:34 PMKatitof No. But denying long proven facts and zealously defending every single OP unit just because it is in the faction you play most, arguing that perfectly fine if not overperforming units have no place or are too weak or don't scale good despite having THE best scaling in the whole game has. No one takes you seriously anymore, because vast majority of your posts read like they were ripped from another dimension or fairy tale. If you were slightly more aggressive then you'd be crowned as worthy successor of vetlolcake and worthy of sitting between sierra and jaigen. Please bring up some examples, because so far the 2 people that have said this haven't done so at all. If you want me to explain my position on a unit just bring it up. I don't know why you are acting so childish and aggressive when Iv stated multiple times that I don't think the balance is in a good place. Most of the time I'm just trying to point out to people that even good units/over preforming ones have weakness, balance is about fine tuning not smashing things with the nerf bat. I don't hold any any controversial opinions, I just think most factions except Ostheer are pretty cheesy because that's how the game is at the moment. Spamming maxims or cons is no more less cheesy and dumb than spamming volks or spamming rifles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks11 Feb 2015, 22:12 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 21:53 PMdasheepeh OKW + Ostheer have Schrecks. Vs Soviets, understandable against big call ins. An American player has little to say with Bazookas doesnt he? Boom. King Tiger. Boom. Tiger Ace. Oh the glorious 60 munitions i spend on these! Only to see them bounce or miss. Meant to be used medium armor? Youre funny. Give the factions with the strongest Anti tank weaponry the sturdiest and strongest tanks. Oh balance! The point isn't that it's alright that they are only good against mediums, it's just that in the current meta right now they don't preform well because people neglect the Axis mediums because they are quite easy to counter. Ostheer T3 is in a horrible place at the monument, and OKW has no medium tank. You want to see less heavy spam? How about giving OKW a MBT that costs less than 175 fuel. You can't whine that OKW only make Heavy/Powerful tanks when that's pretty much all they have. In: COH2 Balance