Profile of Alexzandvar

Alex, as you seem to have conveniently forgotten about my stats all of a sudden, I am well versed in 4v4 Wehr and OKW. Please don't tell me how to play. If you want to forgo T4 then you can expect to lose late game 4v4 matches as Osteer. If you think the Panther is useless, the Wefer has not place, the Brumbrar is lackluster, I guess I don't know what to tell you. If you don't understand how much easier it is for the Germans in the 4v4 game modes regardless of the map then I am sorry, I tried explaining it to you but you would not listen.

Good luck.

Ah the "I don't have an argument so your wrong I'm right neener neener neener". Christ dude stop trying to misrepresent what I am saying.

I didn't say the Panther was useless, I said it was inefficient and that you can get more bang for your buck by just sticking to T3 and setting up some LefH's (which actually have range longer then spitting distance) for your indirect needs.

You are arrogant as hell dude, every time I try to address your arguments you just pull a "no your wrong" without giving an reason why which makes me question if you have actually played the game recently. Statements like "Late game super heavy call ins" when Ostheer has one that's limited to one.

Yes Alex,I did point out that the differences are small in 1 vs 1 and I agree,better "shit" should cost more...I was refering to stock units(Grens being better than Cons,HMG being better than Maxim 1910) which are the same price,but combat wise perform differently...I am no top 200 player,but for me Ostheer is easier than Sov(no WFA),still factions seem more balanced than ever...

Ostheer is easier because it's well designed. Soviets are getting there, WFA factions have a ways to go (although OKW is much closer than USF).

Cons beat grens at close range, maxims can reposition faster and have more durable crew. Despite something being worse than something else pure numbers wise doesn't mean that unit is objectively worse if you look at the big picture.

Honestly looking purely at stats and nothing else while avoiding context is the reason why arguments on these forums tend to get so hostile so quickly because people place more value on being correct about specific stats than grasping the larger picture. This results in an endless cycle of flame wars as people compete to win "I was right" points.

Uuuummmm manpower concerns? The fact it's called a TEAM game? There should be some communication as to who does what. If not, the other team deserves to win.

I am incredibly in favour of the fuel caches only benefiting the player who built them. This will keep the precious competitive 1v1 risk-reward thing intact. At the same time it will IMMENSELY help 4v4s.

In a 4v4 a single fuel cache will give something like 300 (more like 400+ because longer games) fuel total distributed over the players, during the course of the game. Multiply by 3 or, on some maps 4 caches. The tech tree was not made to accomodate this, it's insane.

Why not just reduce the income you get from fuel caches then? Because all I see making fuel caches player exclusive doing is fucking up randoms ever more.

Just make it so each player is limited to 1 fuel cache and 2 munitions caches if you want to limit cache spam. That way if you only have 1 Ost team mate you can't have him spam caches on every single point.

It's still just band-aid fixes because as long as the maps are nothing but retarded campfests then Axis will continue to do better because they can stack more forces on top of each other due to having more expensive "condensed" units.

Mobile defense archieves little against anyone with half a brain, as they will just get an Su-76 or a Zis afterwards (or both).
In general I really don't get the people who say OH of all factions is strong this patch....its just not.

Thats the point, SU-76's don't really do well against Puma's. You can use smoke to cover your assaults and for when your retreating. Puma's use the old TWP that guarantees penetration and you can easily stun lock tanks with two.

Like it's not about strait up beating your opponent in every battle it's about bleeding him down to nothing till he just can't bang his head against the wall anymore. Check my replays if you want any examples. (My latest one even got casted!)

The CPIV is also insanely durable in mobile defense because you get smoke + the .8 damage reduction. It can also keep your Puma packs alive in a big push and if they get blown up? who cares you can call in more.

As a bonus the coax on the Puma can be a danger to snipers so if your getting bled by one just shoo it off. Oh and you will be floating shitloads of muni because you don't need to spend any on upgrades (because your using infantry that just come with them for free). I can't understate the value of being able to instantly replace losses when it comes to keeping map control.

casted

Awesome job dude! Thanks for the cast!