Profile of Specialka

Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2015, 11:59 AMJaigen

Oh ffs are you stupid? i didnt say they pg or sp could not defeat rifles at midrange they cannot do so cost effectively. you put 2 rifles like volks or scripts against every single pg or in the case of grens or rifleman (who are more expensive but has way better dps) you simply curb stomp them simply because you have far more hp on your side for mp then the sp or pg. so the only way to be cost effective is close range and they are not suited for that.

Shocks on the other hand are more durable , cheaper (costing slightly more then a single gren) and have the tools to get close to enemy in form of smoke. because of all this you sometimes see 1vs1 games with 3 shocks. okw however uses volks + obers and ost uses pure gren spam simply because how bad sp and pg's are.

And if you disagree with simple match show me a fucking replay where you use 2-3 pg's/sp successfully.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2014, 18:04 PMJaigen

In short L2P

Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2014, 13:34 PMRupert

Assuming about as much as someone who assumes that pumas are immortal. Fair enough?




"lame strategies?" Define lame please. In any RTS, knowing the most efficient tactics/build order IS part of skill in becoming a better player. So when you say "an average player who does not know these 'lame strategies'", automatically translates to "below average player who has yet to understand the game".

I mean "lame"? Right. Whatever moral/ethical standards you have does not translate to the game very well. Unless the player is abusing an obvious flaw or bug (inb4 katitof claims volkshreks are massive flaw!), no strategy is "lame" by definition. You have no right pushing your arbitrary code of conduct to others in deciding what is efficient and effective.



What is wrong with being a part of a community in a frigging MULTIPLAYER GAME????

Hell, the most popular game on the face of the earth such as World of Warcraft, League of Legends, DotA, Starcraft2 - all require extensive knowledge of the game meta and community-provided build order/strategy/tactics in order to perform as somebody who isn't a detriment "in an average level."

You seem to misunderstand "Average" and "below average players". Multiplayer ranked games are by DEFINITION competitive. Hence it's "ranked". You are required to do your own research, replay analysis, stream-viewing or whatever that you may need to understand the game better and play in the competitive scene.

Now Im not saying everyone should do so, but if you want to win you need to put in the effort. Hello? Am I asking for too much? If you want to win, you need to deserve it! Am I back in 1950's Soviet Russia or something?




And I highly doubt that they will be suddenly climbing the ladder just by switching to Axis. I have yet to see anyone prove me after they go on claiming that "I am better skilled but only lost because the other faction is better".



"abusing stupid strats" - here we go again with your moral code on strats. I've dealt with the logical flaw here so moving on.



Way to shove stuff I didn't say up my fricking mouth man. Again your arbitrary moral judgement on units do not add to the discussion, so pleas use a diary or a priest to rant moral issues with pixellated data.
On the other hand, the "stupid units" only come for a certain price in a certain time - which makes you, the opponent - obligated to outplay the opponent to delay and punish such units as much as possible.

This is the logic I see in these posts : None of the defenders in Soccer mark the opponent's forward only to have him score. And you blame the rules and say "one goalkeeper is not enough to block a ball coming to the net! We need 2 or 3 goalies!"



In larger team games, I see many soviets go T2-T4 and go Katusha as the first vehicle to punish that. And it works really well especially since the last buff to katushas and infantry behavior patch.

And more often than not, USF bar blob beats volk blob through smoke and sheer firepower until obers are out, but by then allies should have katushas as well.



Which isn't too far off as the poster that I replied to assumes that pumas are "immortal" - which would require a lot more macro/micro skill to avoid shrek fire by manually charging at infantry with vehicles.

Keeping a puma alive means guessing where enemy mines are,and kiting to avoid AT nades that dmg engine.... a lot harder than running m20 into a volks squad and pushing it around.

Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2014, 23:40 PMelchino7

Since i, and everyone, can check the leaderboards i disagree.
USF/OKW/Soviet/OH

Omgpop 1/14/7/3
Jesulin 2/3/1/1
Spanky 3/40/310/38
Ihitto 4/26/128/28
Holyhammer 5/9/13/15
Luvnest 6/7/2/9
Geimfari 7/22/29/203
Fancy 8/5/3/7
Giap 9/10/11/6

I could continue. 90% of the people on top100 have at least 1 more faction ,if not all, on top100.

#facts #GGWP

@Rocket.
First paragraph.
While i may agree up to some point on the general idea i'm gonna correct some missconceptions. Indirect fire and tank shells doesn't get affected* (*negligible) by their veterancy.
Finally: if you are gonna play as USF at 3v3+, better you be the only USF player or you are really gonna have a bad time. USF is design to be a heavy ability micro faction on the late game.

Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2014, 17:03 PMLemonJuice

lmfao, seriously?i was responding to people complaining that the game needs to cater to their skill level. while this is true to some extent, if you want a game to be competitive the player needs to step up to the plate and improve themselves to match the challenge.