Profile of Grumpy

I could tell most players thought that axis were OP (longer Axis wait times), but really allies had excellent options for dealing with them even in the lategame. Especially the 76mm shermans from the US.

There were only a few units that seemed OP. The Tiger felt crazy-good when we were just comp-stomping as Axis but when we faced some in a couple games, they didn't make a huge impact.

The Guastatori were a bigger problem. Those felt like playing against flamethrower Penals, except that they also had smoke so not even an MG would slow them down. IIRC, they even have a snare.

I heard some complaining about the Black Prince, but didn't see one in a game.

I don't think it will flop. I played about 10 hours of it this weekend without a single bugsplat. I'll take that over better sounds. Considering that most people play single-player, all the customization options in unit composition will probably keep them playing longer than players did with COH2.

The UI could be better arranged, but after playing it long enough I got used to it. COH1's and COH2's were better but it isn't so bad that the game is unplayable.

The tactical map needs to go back to the old size. They shrunk it to where it isn't very helpful. Also, in COH2, rotating the tac map would rotate the normal view without changing the elevation. They changed that for COH3 and I'm not a fan.

The instant, launching s-mines from the Tiger are going to generate a lot of complaints. So far my record is 2 full squads wiped. Call-ins of all types seem strong, but especially the American air call-ins.

I liked the change to the Walking Stuka. It looks better and is more accurate to what it would've been.

I'm not sure I'm a fan of all the ways to get free veterancy.

PLS do not make unsupported accusation of "edits" on wiki page.

Here is the link to the wiki page and here is the quote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elefant

"Conclusions

The Ferdinand/Elefant may have been the most successful mass produced tank destroyer employed during the war in kills per loss[citation needed], reaching an average claimed ratio of approximately 10:1. During the Battle of Kursk, sPzJgrAbt 653 claimed to have knocked out 320 enemy tanks, for the loss of 13 Ferdinands.[10] This impressive average ratio was due to its superior firepower and protection, which gave it an enormous advantage when used in head-on combat or a static defensive role (however note that claimed tank kills are well-proven to invariably greatly exceed actual kills, and different organizations have different standards of defining a 'kill'). However, poor mobility and mechanical unreliability greatly diminished its operational capability.

The Elefant and Nashorn were both superseded by the Jagdpanther. All three vehicles mounted the same gun, with only some minor differences between them. The Jagdpanther—a true jagdpanzer—was a successor to the other two, combining acceptable mobility and good, sloped armour while retaining the excellent gun, mostly solving the reliability, mobility, and/or protection problems that the earlier vehicles had. "

There has been no edit it is wikipedia which talk about mass production and not me , so pls stop defaming other forum members by accusing them of "editing" quotes.

I didn't accuse anyone here of changing anything on Wiki. Stop making defamatory claims about me.

You still don't understand the basic point that 91 of anything does not equal mass produced. It is barely beyond a prototype.

You may or may not have a PhD, but using the title bestowed upon you is contingent upon respect. With the way you talk to people on this forum, you neither command respect nor deserve it. You'll be called whatever people feel appropriate and that is enough.

In this case, I think it is a "Piled higher and Deeper" title, and has something to do with sanitation.

I was completely indifferent that Pershing was not in the game. And yes, I will continue to believe that the Black Prince has no place in the game. The game is based on World War II, you take the time period you take its limitation. Do you want the Black Prince? Go to Operation Unthinkable and alternate history. You can add anything there: Black Prince, Centurion, Tortoise, T95 everything that did not get into the war. Leave WWII with WWII units.

None of us play COH because we think it is historically accurate. I'd play the much more realistic snooze-fest called Steel Division, then just arty and rocket the shit out of Axis heavies when I play allies, or faust Shermans with their paper-thin armor when playing Axis.

All of the factions need heavies as damage sponges, particularly in the larger game modes. It has nothing to do with historical accuracy.

Relic is trying. I'd rather they not add new features and worry more about making the existing ones less buggy but they're probably thinking that a new game needs new features.