|
Ok, so you think it is overperforming, I think it's not. What now? You would have to come up with some pretty accurate and good data about increased win rates in games where B4 was used and built or something the like to prove your point here. Gonna be difficult! |
Thread: Bunkers22 Jun 2021, 15:52 PM
Dont bother, this guy is out of his mind. |
Also, abbreviations don't help. I'm pretty sure you meant stunden but STD is something more like herpes or gonorrhea so you could've got a really interesting output from Google translate. Then the mods would have to move the post into the B4 thread.
Oh this is beautiful  |
|
Jeez, this is terrible, tell us more!
So you were saying they are not underpowered early game, have a solid mid-game tank and they EVEN GOT OPTIONS in the late game?
And on top of that, you even have to face them regularly? I thought one of the two oldest factions and the only allied faction available without premium content is not played by anyone?
You poor soul, this is outrageous! |
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 15:54 PM
It does, it's just a rare case of the nade failing to pen the bunker.
Yeah, but the concept of penetrating/failing to penetrate does not make a whole lot of sense on a nade/explosion vs a building.
But OP also had other points like pop cap for bunkers.
I think he was giving thoughts and proposing a few ideas, not DEMANDING or anything. Let's talk with reason, shall we? |
The purpose of this patch is to create an as large amount of middle ground (good/viable) commanders as possible to increase commander diversity. Not to create more top meta commanders.
This definitely worked for me. I am suddenly swimming in commanders I can use. Is it Reserve Tactics, allowing for a complete army with Sov T1 including team weapons? Is it Shock Army with T34/85 and Shocks? Is it Tank hunter with B4 and AT bombs for big team games? Sov Industry with Recon and Repair station? It's just beautiful and I'm very happy. |
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 15:35 PM
> has no matches as Wehr and only 5 as OKW
> calls other people fanboy
I am not the one overreacting hysterically when someone proposes a slight change to my beloved bunkers/my whatever.
Well tbf this really looks and feels strange. In my opinion the light gammon bomb should at least deal a bit of damage (and so should Bundle to Sov. Bunker ... if it doesn't already)
See, anyone with reason clearly sees the point of OP. No need to start trembling out of my-faction-could-get-nerfed-anxiety. |
|
Your german is hardly understandable, too. |
Build LEFH and, brace for it, actually use it by targetting it properly instead of old "press button and forget about indirect fire for the rest of the game".
Jeez, the poor guys, this is unacceptable! Just think, this is actual micro! |
Why are OST and OKW elite infantry so much worse than Allied one cause MG42.
Where did you get that from or when did you make that up?
So in that Very same reason Pershing should not be any closer to tiger due to 60 Range Ultra Mobile Turreted TD like the Jackson.
I dont understand how allied AT has anything to do with Allies paying the same and getting a worse tank than axis for that money. Axis have by far enough AT options to fend a Pershing off, do you want me to list them for you? I dont even see an argument here, it's ridiculous. |
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
