Profile of Durabo

I havent read all of the posts but here's my 2 cents. People who say luchs does more damage than a t70 is right. Only if the infantry luchs shooting is out of cover and both are stationary. For infantry in cover, t70 does way better. And even in the open you can argue t70 does more. If the t70 is stationary it snipes a squadmember in every 1-2 shots and it fires VERY VERY fast. Seriously if it isnt max range and squad it is shooting at is not a vet 5 volks squad, it kills a model almost every shot.

I also agree stuart needs a dps buff aganist infantry. Both t70 and stuart could also use a hp buff but i'm not sure. Pak is nurf'd pretty hard. Also bear in mind luchs costs 50 OKW fuel. If we were to use every detail to strengthen our argument, since okw recieves 1/3 less fuel which means enemy recieves %50 more, you could say luchs costs 75 normal fuel which is huge. But it also comes from a cheaper tech building etc etc, you cant compare all of the costs associated with going one unit over another since there are many variables(like delaying other units). Also about the abilities i find t70s recon mode on vet 3 more useful than the stealth mode on luchs.

Oh and fusilier&rifleman at nades should go off faster. It will affect and limit luchs's impact.

Well, i have seen a replay in which ost player countered 2 is2's using a p4 and vetting 2 stug's to vet1 with elite troops. Their stun is deadly. Other than that i agree with you, p4 is way better since its almost twice as durable. Stug has better anti armor capability but meh, p4 is way better.

If shreks are going to be moved to the sturms, it would be better to give them 2 like pgrens. Also giving both of em the ability to put out their shreks when not needed will be great. Well give that only to pgrens maybe i dunno.

I agree, it needs a cost decrease and/or a significant buff.

I concur, it takes too long to fire the first shot thus making it almost completely ineffective vs fast vehicles.