Profile of JohnnyB

You would literally never see T3 ever be built again, The Jackson already owns it, so why would you want to make Soviets own it to? The StuG III needs an armor and health buff, and the Jackson just needs to do less damage but have better ROF or Pen.

The STUG 3 ausf G needs a health buff at most, not armor. Jackson needs better penetration or better health.

How to counter assgren spam strat early game?

Build an M3 you noob.

I did and I still dont know why you think forward retreat point is OK, and what strategic decisions and disadvantages come with Med truck and Mjr.

Strategic decisions: WHERE should I place my retreat point on map? Closer to my base?Closer to his? Closer to a cutoff? Closer to a resources/victory point , etc. Should I shield it with a house or with some trees? How to place it in order for retreating units to easily access it?

Disadvantages: An advanced retreat point can be shelled with balistic weapons that can be placed verry safe (NEAR or even IN your opponent base). An advanced retreat point can be shelled with off maps and can be easilly spoted in order to. Finally, an advanced retreat point can be stormed in team games by 2-3 armies in the same time, and be made one with the ground with all retreated units.

Is it more clear now?

Im sorry, but what disadvantages Mjr&Med truck have?

Read all my post kappa.

well, in some maps, the impact is ok. in other maps, forward retreat points give exponential advantages, allowing one side to come back to the field in 30 seconds while another would take 3 minute.

to completely balance the forward retreat point, the entire automatch map pool has to take that into account. not to mention some maps have this perfect spot for forward retreat points that only mortars can reach.

the whole thing takes away many interesting things from the game imo. wouldnt mind them being removed completely.

There is nothing wrong with forward retreat points, no matter what map you are playing. It involves strategic decisions and come also with disadvantages. This game isn't and should not be all about micro. It should involve brains also. If a player succeed to beat the other just because he made better decisions despite his inferior micro, we should value that.
Such are all the complaints related to different "exploits" like blobbing or placing the OKW T4 or whatever. If your opponent blobbed the shit out of you and you had enough amo to place let's say, several demo charges on his path but you didn't, you have no right to complain that he is a noob and beated you because he is a gardening spammer. If you are complaining that your opponent built shermans to fast and killed your volks blobs that could not handle them with their schrecks, but you didn't chose the fortifications doctrine (PAK 43) though you had it in your loadout, you have no right to complain that you didn't have fuel to build enough vehicles to counter your opponent. And the list can continue. Sometimes good decisions are more valuable than micro. And a well placed retreat point is a good decision, though risky. Because forward retreat points can be shelled like hell with ballistics that will do alot of damage. You knew that, I suppose.