Profile of BrutusHR

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 262

General Information


Thread: Panzershrecks outrange T70 and T342 Jan 2015, 23:43 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2015, 23:35 PMVon Kluge Let's stop with the personal attacks here *and be nice kiddo's*! thanks Sure thing boss. But this is pure gold! Back on topic... If we are looking for a shreck nerf, then a okw AT need a serious buff. imo In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzershrecks outrange T70 and T342 Jan 2015, 23:30 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2015, 23:14 PMQueenRatchet123 I guess with 8 games u must know everything about sov and usf? stop with the sarcasm. almost everyone here has more credibility than you Sarcasm? Never heard of it, and sorry, but last thing to be worried is credibility by people like you, didn't even knew that i had any on this forum, heh, but thanks for such a cheap laugh. QueenRatchet123 and credibility. oxymoron* right there In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzershrecks outrange T70 and T342 Jan 2015, 23:05 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2015, 22:59 PMQueenRatchet123 Oh man coming from the guy with literally 8 allied games spare all of us with ur bullshit Don't need more than that Just FYI question, does this playercard reads games against bots? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzershrecks outrange T70 and T342 Jan 2015, 22:54 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2015, 22:30 PMLemonJuice okw shreks cost 108 munitions if you factor in the munitions penalty. O man u can't do that, are u crazy? There is no such thing as any kind of penalty for OKW, just bonuses, because shreck is so OP and better than zook it negates the penalty In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Demos31 Dec 2014, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2014, 19:45 PMelchino7 Thing is, it's EASIER to win as axis/OKW by playing badly than to win as allies by playing regularly. Allies have the tools to be stronger but they have to perform better. OKW is WAY more forgiving in the sense that if allies don't abuse of squadwiping tools, they don't stand a chance with "regular engagements" on the long run. TLDR u need to be a pro to win as allies. That's true because i said it and if u say otherwise u are stupid fanboy and also a nazi In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs30 Dec 2014, 02:27 AM Well, we all can agree that this game is still beta material in many things. The day vCoh is fixed is day i leave this wanabe coh game. Problem is, vCoh wont be fixed... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs26 Dec 2014, 22:41 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 10:20 AMAustralian Magic So in fact US Forces have to use Jackson because there is no other unit which could be used in late game. How broken is that? Soviets have: IS, ISU, SU (better pen than Jackson and sefl spotting) and T34/85+Mark Target, ZiS Ost: Tiger, Tiger Ace, Panther, Elephnat, Pak43, Pak40. OKW: schreck blob, Panther, Sturmtiger, King Tiger, Jadgtiger, Pak43 USF: Jackson... Even E8 is not usefull since Panther wrecks it and there is nothing like mark target to use them efficiently like T34. So in fact if you won't pick up P47 you are going to have really bad time in late-game. How often do you see any other doctrine in 1v1/2v2? Airborne is in about 80% of the games because USF lack of late-game AT units. Imagine situation where Ost player is forced to take JU in every game because if he won't he will lose. Well, there is nothing wrong with e8, not it's not a heavy unit, but it's still easy to spam. Btw, panther is a unit that can only go after tanks and it is alot more expensive than e8, and require teching, and it cant deal with infantry like e8, if u want that e8 has a very good chance against panther in head on scenario, then, u have no idea what ur talking about. And no, panther doesn't make e8 a bad unit. I agree that USF needs some tweaking on late game, but only if ur going to compensate on early game. Btw. sturmtiger is a troll unit. Very expensive, very slow, big target, slow aim, unable to move wile reloading that takes around 50-60 sec. It's not a late game solution, for anything except having fun in already won game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 17:02 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 16:16 PMAustralian Magic 2. No one is saying that Jackson is slow. From design it should be unit that flank so it must be fast. Point is Tiger or Panther are unflankable. No one ever complains about Panther because of HP,huge armor,penetration, smoke and insane blitzkrieg ability. 3. Right know axis heavies wipe more often than allies or at least at the same level. Bulls*it... Happy? It was more cleaner last time, but hey. King tiger is a unit in a weird place. That doesn't means that axis heavy wipe more often. That sentences is easy to manipulate, overall only tiger and KT can reliably deal with infantry, axis medium's aren't that great against inf. Like u would trade jackson for panther because of bigger Hp pool and armor, i would trade JT for isu, and pz4 for sherman. Even tiger for IS2. But it doesn't work like that in this game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 16:16 PMAustralian Magic 2.Point is Tiger or Panther are unflankable. No one ever complains about Panther 3. Right know axis heavies wipe more often than allies Bulls*it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 15:52 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 14:36 PMAustralian Magic T70 is smaller everywhere (just 20cm higher). Its about balance. Powerful gun, very good front armor, sneak mode, small target size. Im not saying its OP but Im saying thats is little unbalance to give unit so many profits. Like i said, smaller target size makes sense, because m3 is alot and t70 something less higher than jpz4, Very simple, just imagine that any of these 3 tanks facing u. Who will be the hardest target to hit? It is a OK unit, if it isn't OP then it isn't unbalanced, it is still pricey and i will rather go for panther. It can't see in reverse and that is a huge minus. It can have every possible feature in game, if it isn't OP or UP then don't change it. There is alot of other things to fix than units that don't need fixing, like 60% of the current game. Still, i dont see it often on battlefield. Because there are better things to invest fuel, and if this unit need any change, i dare to say that it will sooner need a buff than a nerf. My 2 cents. In: COH2 Balance