Profile of Esxile

So anything is a soft counter by this logic. Not even a firefly can kill a panzer 4 if the player has skills to protect it.
I can't understand the logic behind it (does it imply luchs build time should be 240 second so jackson and firefly come at the same time LUL ?) but i'm sure those hardcounter luchs.

And what's the issue there ? Apparently atg's and snares/handheld at can't counter light vehicle, luchs implies no puma, so...

And aec and stuart stun shot are extremely helpful, as well as the sulimple at perfirmances, like puma..in the hand if a player worth a minimal amount of salt those scale perfectly till late game.

Luch vs AEC or Stuart matchup is balanced, its light vehicle play and the winner of this game between cat and dog isn't determined by mechanism but by skill and strategy. Stuart or AEC aren't death sentence for the Luch, a Luch can still be used and do what it is supposed to do, killing infantry, even if the opponent has an AEC or a stuart.

The problem lie in Luch vs infantry. At the moment the Luch hit the field, Infantry isn't enough prepared to receive it. This has little to do with skill, if soft counters aren't available at that time, then being more skillful isn't going to help you.

- Coh1 had great economical layers in each tiers. All of those layers were making sense and part of the strategical decisions players had to take.

Whermarch layers were bound to the veterancy system and USF had different teching choices to improve their basic units at the cost of slowing the teching to the next tier.
Relic should definitively go back to this deep but really easy to understand economical management for each faction. Coh2 economical model just don't work, Ostheer tiering is half done, BPs should have been made in a form of various layers unlocking units or abilities from the previous tier so the player could decide to have an extensive play with its T1 by unlocking BP2 (unlocking new abilities and/or special units) but at the cost of delaying its T2 etc...

- Coh2 map resource design is better to manage than Coh1. Finally I find it better to have a multitude of point providing any resource in few quantity and a couple of points on the map dedicated to a unique resource. But what is definitively missing is the Coh1 Popcap system, popcap should be a ressource to be managed as much as fuel, amo and manpower.

- Coh1 doctrine system is much better. To me Coh2 doctrines management is a kind of failure or an unfinished asset of the game due to THQ bankrut. I only hope Relic take inspiration from Coh1 than Coh2 on this topic.

- Cut the british design, it was a failure in Coh1, and is still a failure in Coh2.

- More design around units synergy and stop designing factions around gaps. One of the biggest issue with Coh2 is that half of factions have been design around gaps. Soviet lack of big tanks, USF lack of support unit, OKW lack of suppression unit and medium tanks etc.. This design method doesn't work because in order to fullfil the gap artificially created you need to make other units stronger than they are supposed to be ,bringing the game to a lot of unbalance aspects.

The trolling gets old to be honest. I just want to remind you that these expert opinions need to be taken with a grain of salt. These experts are mostly 1v1 players, with a regular 2v2 here and there. They rarely play 3v3 and 4v4, let alone often. They give, however, feedback for a patch that is aimed primarily at balancing 3v3 and 4v4. The justification for changes based on their expert opinions is dubious at best.

Didn't they also speak with some best 2vs2 and 4vs4 teams to bring balances around late game units on those mods?

Wehr and OKW have a most expensive medium tanks, but cromwell and sherman much better and have more abilities than P4. In the same time allies have the best medium tank-hunters (say hello to firefly with tulips and su85 with unlimited sight), brits have a comets, what have an armor like a tiger, and have no limit to build. And dont forget about pershing who need much less experience to gain veterancy, than a tiger.
Really unique things are the only KT, JT and Ferd, but they are really easy to destroy with a competent micro and tactics.

Honestly I really much more like a allies tanks, then axis.

Majority of Axis players don't know how to use a Panzer4 or a Panther. The majority of players I face are diving hard with their tank because they see they have more armor or more health. Can't count how many Pz4 I destroyed because he dived hard to finish my sherman and forget that his tank is absolutely not accurate on the move.

You can't blame the game when you act so stupidly. I don't know how you can consider that Allied tank (at least USF tanks) are easier to use than Axis one's. They have less health and less armor, you need to micro 2 or 3 of them at the same time because you don't have any super big tank that does everything for you, as they are made of paper armor, more than ofter, you need to use smoke to save their ass. If you don't understand what does it means, it is easy, cut half of your Pz4 and Panther armor and add a button that will grant you full armor for 5/10 seconds for 60 munition so you can escape "more" safely.

Allied tank are not easier to use, you just face the same Axis players that have no clue how to manage their tanks. If they knew it, as good Axis players do, you would never said that.

Show Spoiler

Old strat, you're late . The strat works better with 4xHTMortar, you don't really need Scott when your HTm are V3 by the time you call your major.
My clan played a lot with this strat 6 months ago to the point I was asking every time to not use it in internal games. The only counter is build 3 or 4 222 or Luch, flank and target the HTm pack but this strat is so special that nobody imagine to do that. Its an all-in vs all-in.