Profile of ☭ Калашникова ☭

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 322

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Temp1st


Thread: The Tiger ace6 Apr 2015, 20:12 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 20:09 PMCabreza It has been mentioned elsewhere but the easiest fix for the TA would be to make it cost as much as a regular Tiger but in compensation remove the resource penalty. That way the advantage of the ability would be that you get a vet3 Tiger on steroids for the price of a regular Tiger while the disadvantage would be you only get one so you better damn well keep it alive. In some respects that would be a rather large buff to TA. You would be able to support it with other tanks and replace said tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M10 Cost6 Apr 2015, 20:10 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 19:57 PMKatitof It does nothing more then AT really. It has the best crush in the game. It is literally faster than a T-70. But other than that i think its fine.. Need to see more games with it. Its good that it's viable now. it was shit before, Now its in a good spot i feel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Tiger ace6 Apr 2015, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 18:05 PMilGetUSomDay Plenty of time to prepare by dumping manpower into AT guns while a standard Ostheer force with vetted grens slaughters your infantry? Pretty easy to prepare I see..... See this is one of those trade offs I'm suggesting that exist in the game for almost every unit in the game other than the Tiger Ace If he is dumping vet into gren's he wont be able to stall to 15cp. If he does off of only t2 you fucked up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CAS needs adjusted6 Apr 2015, 04:34 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 03:20 AMNuclear Arbitor lol, they're not dogeable. they'll miss if you place them badly or the enemy accidentally move but otherwise they always hit. Its hard to take a balance discussion of CAS seriously when stuff like this is being said. 1. single passes basically do not have a counter (except dodging). no AA unit can even remotely reliably counter it. so the single passes are basically glorified arty call in. but with kamikaze possibilities. using that logic, lets compare it to other call in arties. obviously, if you disagree with me here, there is no real reason to read further. Then lets push for AA buffs and remove that RNG aspect of crashing planes? add a 1s delay to the strikes and call it a day. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 22:24 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 21:33 PMjajaja That is where you are wrong. When you need to play 'well' to counter your opponents mindless lmg and shrek blob and clicky offmaps, thats not balanced, but unbalanced. Kat Truck. They stop blobs. So dose Shock rifle frontline and ISU. If you are unable to stop a blob with the correct tools then i really don't know what to say. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 09:35 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 08:38 AMAustralian Magic So are you denying that in team games cas is double win cause of mass crashes or that on certain maps is undodgeable? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 06:29 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 06:12 AMpigsoup it is basically saying L2P. adds nothing 'cept yours had a facade of "helpful" tips. i played sov the most, ost second, usf third etc. but my favourite list goes usf, ost, sov. you can still have bias even when playing all factions. the fact that when we are talking about alleged ostheer cheeseness, and you keep swinging back to sov's cheeseness only bolster my view. i have problem with CAS but i am not here to shove my opinion dick into ppl's mouths. there are many threads like this on the official forum and quite a few here. i am hoping relic sees it and analyse the situation themselves. if nothing happens, nothing happens. if CAS changes, i will see if it is for the better. etc etc. i just have problem with ppl spreading non-facts. You want Ostheer cheese? Its Luft supply in 4's dropping fuel on maps like lienne forest. That is cheesy but CAS? Only reason i bring up soviet cheese is they just so happen to have more of it to choose from. Also please point out were i spread 'non facts' All the counter's listed are effective vs a CAS user. Very effective in fact. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 05:26 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 04:52 AMpigsoup problem is that you are basically telling people that counter to CAS commander is playing well. and selling it like it is CAS specific counterplay while it is just pure logical play in almost every single game Well if 'Playing well' Is the counter, Then its good balance, Its nether too easy to pull off nor too easy to counter. Were as doing FHQ is the opposite problem very easy to pull off and very difficult to stop without good coordinated play from 4 players. Btw my allied ranking is higher then my axis ranking currently and i play all 4 on a regular basis. So i feel like calling me factionally partisan is a little unfair. And B-4 potentially 1 shotting a JT was bullshit. That kind of damage made CAS necessary. Allies have plenty of late game options With their doctrines, I personally like medium swarms, But have used IS-2 and ISU to great effect as well. when did i say "adjusted"? i am not the OP. So you don't have a problem with it? The most legitimate argument ive seen is 'It comes too fast from the edge of the map' So if anything were to be done id say add 1s to the flight time so it gives the allied player more time to move. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 04:42 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 01:59 AMpigsoup all the supposed counterplay you mentions is either a. obvious suggestion that works in every game b. assuming ostheer player is blobbing noob. Well if it works every game then what is the problem? And i think it is safe to assume that the CAS player will blob to some extent. i dont think it is particularly OP. it is just very cheesy and not fun to play against/with. So by adjusted you mean nerfed? Not trying to be a asshole just want some clarification on this, How would you 'adjust' it? As for it being cheesy, You mean things like FHQ in 4's and Quadra industry? Each side has its cheese for 4's and most of them are equally as bullshit. Remember that CAS was a product of seeing B-4 Spam every game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CAS needs adjusted5 Apr 2015, 00:43 AM also when not using CAS If you loose your Kat/priest/ISU/IS2 due to CAS its your fault. Dodge it. yep. AI strafe that you have 1 sec to dodge and AT strafe that you have 2-4 sec to dodge. such skillshot, click and click. much wow. Dodge it. they both drop smoke and are only that fast when on the edges of the map. you can dodge .5 sec grenades but you can't dodge a 1.5-2s plane skillshot? That drops red smoke. with your infantry yelling AIRSTRIKE as well. demo rape everything and if CAS user blobs and lose a lot to a demo? entirely his fault. Yep exactly why you should be using it a lot vs CAS players. one p4 and pak or one panther then day not ruined. thank the gods. If he has a panther you don't have to worry about the strikes as much as hes wasted a ton of fuel for that panther. 'cept it is much bigger resource hog and having dedicated AA unit will make ostheer player lose 2/3 of the investment almost always. Soviet Quad sucks at shooting this thing down and it will get its first pass off and it won't miss. The CAS one costs half but can miss. The loitering is secondary. At the end of the day. Dodge it. If you want to push for stronger Allied AA that's one thing (Something that i agree with) But don't be all like "Oh its uncountable" In: COH2 Gameplay