Coh3 is still a good game, i had good 2v2 still.
CoH 3 is not an unsalvagable game! It's fun, but bland. It needs more content and closer attention from the devs, but that's a tall order considering what we've seen so far.
I hope Relic hires good people...come back and save coh3!
Amen |
That is simply false. Companies make games and not a specific group of people.
That is completely arbitrary attempt to create a connection where there is little to non. It like claiming "Canadian people made COH3, whether that's bad or not is a decision the player makes".
I was speaking generally, not about CoH 3. If I was talking about CoH , I would have said CoH 3. It would be nore accurate to say "canadians are making our games. whether that's bad or not is up to the player." Which is a completely accurate statement.
Anyways, I've already relented on this issue and admitted CoH 3's issues come more from corporate "sell first, develop later" MTX-heavy bullshit, but there is clear proof that Relic is posting about SJW talking points. White men can be SJWs too, if you weren't aware (that whole reddit thread I quoted was from one), they just hate living in their own skin. |
It is both and many other inefficiencies.
We have seen crazy SJW now wasting dev time with their hissy drama about no boobs on female characters!
Yeah, the story is basically about two groups of SJWs arguing over which portrayal of Rivet would be the most "female empowering".
From the Reddit post:
The lead writer was a woman. The lead character TD was a trans person who, at the time, had not transitioned.
Everyone else in the discussion was a white cis male.
At the time the argument occurred, there were two women and one female-presenting trans person on the team. That trans person had lived their life up to that point as a woman, and had the lived experience thereof.
Everyone else on the 20+ person team was a man.
More from the author:
...Fellow men, we're all part of the problem. As a white man in the game industry, I enjoy a ton of privilege, and that also makes me part of the system that causes the issues we see at places like Blizzard.
We all share responsibility.
But just because we're part of the problem doesn't mean we can't take action to remedy it. A systemic problem can be changed by people in the system changing how they behave.
We can help fix the system by making changes in how we behave.
You're in the system. You're part of it whether or not you want to be.
Change how you act, react, and how you move forward.
That's how you help. Change yourself to help fix the problem.
Call out bad behavior. Give people room. Listen.
Also, for the love of god, don't brand yourself as "one of the good ones."
You're not. I'm not...
The "SJWs are making our games bad" is some of the most severe case of brain worms I've seen in this scene lol.
SJWs are making our games. Whether that's bad or not is a decision the player makes. |
I've been gaming since Pong and don't think I've ever seen a company abandon their latest release and go back to an earlier one. I doubt the franchise would survive that.
Running With Scissors
Long story short, Postal 3 (what's the deal with threes in gaming?) was such a massive flop they ended up releasing DLC for Postal 2 implying that all of Postal 3 was a hallucination from a comatose M.C.
They're now in the process of developing Postal 4.
EDIT: It probably helped that they released a no-nonsense PR statement, about how they genuinely fucked up, and encouraged players not to buy Postal 3 because it was so bad. (There was some kind of issue where they had another studio develop the game, but they didn't want to update it and RWS wasn't able to or something. Can't remember correctly.) |
I still think the problem with pitbulls is more the owner than anything else.
The breed was literally created for fighting other dogs for sport. Yes, training is important, but the breed is predisposed to aggression in the same way that a bloodhound has a better sense of smell than its peers. It's not always just "environmental conditions", although the world would certainly be a better place if it was. Bottom line? You can train a pitbull to be nice, but an untrained pitbull is more likely to be aggressive than an untrained Golden Retriever would be. |
Is iron harvest a good time sink? I need a backup when coh3 folds in 6 months. As lonely old gamer manning my boring shop, i go back home to play coh2 regularly. It helps to sharpen my mind and dexterity, but i see an end of an era. I am loss which time sink to switch over?
I hear Diablo4 is coming but it is too clicky and monotone IIRC
Iron Harvest is not fun in PVP. CoH3 seems to have imported TTK from IH and the mecha late game units are usually as slow as paint dries so it's not a very dynamic MP experience.
The PvE and campaign is good, though. From what I've heard. |
Not at all true. Core game is better than CoH2 - particularly at release. But it lacks a lot of polish and some development.
Agree. |
So just to get back on topic, what's the word on CoH 3 tournaments? |
right now [CoH 3] feels a long way off. Coh2 feels significantly more enoyable to me right now, even when playing against meta abuse
The gameplay just feels more satisfying in almost every way
That's because you're a shill /j |
you forgot something:
Tempest Rising -> COH KILLER
Grey Goo -> COH KILLER
Iron Harvest -> COH KILLER
Iron Harvest was cool but didnt lend itself well to PvP |