That really is the purpose of mgs.
We are in agreement that ost is the weakest faction, but it isn't because grens are wholly incapable of fighting rifles. If properly micro'd they can and will win.
If your mg gets flanked, you didn't mg correctly. It seems that the only points you have are that if you get out-played you lose. That is the way it is supposed to be, and wouldn't be much of a game without it.
And I am not sure how much clearer I could make it, grens win v rifleman at range. Do what you have to do to keep them away. This is literally no different to keeping a jackson at range to a kt, it is the exact same concept.
Using units to their strengths is the ENTIRE point of the game.
Three wrong statements here.
One the wehrmacht mg 42 doesn't do the job ur setting to it.Bad mobility,unreliable suppression speed,no damage and rifle smoke and ability to grenade while supprssed or kill gunner by dps alone.If u expect usf player to charge his whole rifle blob frontally at ur mg -u are assuming he is a noob.Even if u suppress 1-2 squads frontally others will flank,gren DPS and number inferiority will not be enough to stop them doing so and mg 42 suppression is so weak in dmg that rifle squad can lay under mg fire for quite same time without losing 1-2 members,even grenade mg.
Wrong flanking can happen simply because he will outnumber ur squads.How does he do this?MP tech disparity and free lieutenant,while ur desperately trying to get a pak and hoping ur 'wonderweapon' mg42 comes good.
Finally comparing jackson and KT to gren-rifle.Most silliest statement of all.Jackson has more range than KT.Jackson is WAAY more faster than KT.Neither of which is the case with grens vis-a -vis rifles,and thus they can't use the advantages possesed by jacksons against kt to keep rifles at arms length .The comparison is a joke.