Profile of Highfiveeeee

Gotta love seeing this ugly skins in almost every game now.
I prefer my tiger stripes or better no skin at all.

Well imo the Afircan corps army is sligthly to similar to the Ostheer:

For example instead of the HMG 34 or 42, give them the Flak 38:

Flak36 (320 menpower)- 4 men crew eqiped with rifles, 2 of them handling the gun (same as the le.IG 18). Its atak would work similar to the Flak HTs with the diffrence that it would have limited firing arc.

So you mean a movable flak that has a firing ark just like the PaK?
That sounds really interesting!
I really like the idea and it would be something totally different.
In addition it would fit in the Brit playstyle for it would be weak against snipers because killing 3 men would make the last one leave the gun like mortars and PaKs.

Free weekends are no good for this board.
Stupid and senseless topics everywhere.

There wouldn't be any big changes to now. People will start with no bulletins and only 3 commanders. They can unlock new things with war spoils but can also buy bulletin packs and commanders.

It would increase the player base immensly but on the other hand they would somehow snub the people that payed for the game. Because only commanders and (rather ugly) skins are not worth the 70€ I payed for this game with WFA.

Thanks yet for your feedback!I appreciate it very much guys!
I just want to make some things clear.
Many people demanded a 88 Flak and of course it was the first thing that came in my mind when I thought about the war in Africa.
Though I don't think it would be useful as a always available weapon for the Afrikakorps because it already has a nice variety of tanks and a Flak 88 could be countered very easily in CoH2, just think about the PaK43.

It's also some kind of sad to see how 'aggresive' people are arguing here.
Hello? It's just an idea that I worked on for some hours, it's not the perfectly balanced thing you would expect in a real game.

In addition I chose those tanks because they could be interesting and fresh. I know that some of them are not as historic accurate as you wish but I tried to focus on the gaming point of view. What would be fun and tactically interesting is IMO more important than what would be correct in terms of historical accuracy. That's why I chose the P III for example, just because it never has been in any CoH before. On the other hand I chose the Goliath because it would give new strategies and tacticsthough it has been on CoH before.

The Tiger is in T4 because I found it interesting to give the Afrika player the ability to go for late game heavy without having him to choose a specific commander without it being such a monstrosity as OKW's King Tiger which simply can't be killed without a lot of sacrifices. For this reason I also mentioned that it would be a earlier Version of the Tiger making him weaker that Ostheer's. I would deeply suggest for the Afrikan commander not to rely on any heavy call in. Nashorn or Wespe, sure! But the actual meta shows, what it gives when all factions rely on their heavy allrounders.