Profile of Raindrop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 105

General Information


Thread: Vet fix March 9th4 Mar 2016, 14:55 PM Does it also fix soviet and wehrmacht vet1 abilitys? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: t34 76 now useless4 Mar 2016, 14:54 PM Maybe they should bring back Soviet industry which they removed during beta. But not as global but a HQ ability that costs 100 menpower and 20 fuel. And only affects T34/76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Axis Faction4 Mar 2016, 14:45 PM I would prefer a German/Italian mix faction if there will be any 3 wehrmacht faction, with Italian infantry and specailized German vehicle to give them some chances vs heavy tanks. Like the Nashorn and Hetzers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Nerf the panzerwerfer already17 Feb 2016, 08:53 AM Should have bigger AoE of suppression, but lower AoE dmg. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: This game is so broken !17 Feb 2016, 08:28 AM Well imo artylery should deal less dmg but in an higher AoE, currently its mostly luck dependant if the shell hits a sqaud and wipes it or does nothing. If the AoE would be bigger but dmg lower we could reliably hit blobs without it being rng dependant. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: panzergrenadier and the schreck upgrade17 Feb 2016, 08:19 AM During alpha players complained that Pgrens still had to much AI dps with only 1 shreck. Problem was that shreck back then had an AoE of 2,5 which was the main reason why the AI was still so high vs inf. So Relic changed it to dual shrecks which didnt realy solve the problem then they nerfed the AoE of the Shreck to 0,5. Overall Pgrens changed alot back in alpha they were like no doc Shock troopers and could easy 1v1. One schreck for maybe even 70 mun wouldn't be so bad on them imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shrek and Bazooka should be more EXPENSIVE11 Dec 2015, 10:23 AM Shreck weapon range to 32 or 30 form 35. This way players would have harder time too a-move them, since tanks would be able to kite them more easyly. Bazooka is fine imo. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Goliath self spotting??10 Dec 2015, 14:10 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2015, 04:16 AMWeißAlchimist and their 360 Degree perfect vision. for realism, shouldn't soviet tanks have to "turn out" to see in combat and risk being de-crewed by small arms fire? Honestly I think that would be an good idea if most AFV would have more vision. This would force combined arms play. Goliaths imo should have a small field of vision like 5 ingame. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet vehicles10 Dec 2015, 14:05 PM No fan of giving the Katy more AoE, it already has an easier time because most Wehr inf. are 4 men sqauds. T34/76 were used until the end of the war. I dont think we will see any changes but I would have liked if Relic would have added something like Coh1 allied war machine with the diffrence that vehcile losses would be replaced with T34/76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PG's bundle-grenade vs usf riflemen grenade10 Dec 2015, 13:50 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Dec 2015, 13:14 PMKatitof 75 muni, T4 requierment, short range, long throw animation, but can snare or stun temporarily vehicles? Yes thats how it was used in real life. Well mostly to destroy tank tracks ect.. Cost increase would be fine. Its current form is more that of a normal grenade not x7. In: COH2 Balance