Posts: 1979
Keep the ram, since in 2v2 matches 2 soviets can't take down superheavys effienctly without t-34-76 ram & il-2 bombing combo. Su-85 can't chase retreating axis armor.
Posts: 88
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Wasn't it better before? Like guaranteed crippling crit of some sort? I remember it being the only counter to Tiger Ace at launch. Just ram the ace with a T34 and then nearly kill it with tank destroyers, then let the economy drain do the rest.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 5279
It was, but people found it overpowered to throw 280mp and 90 fuel AT nade.
Posts: 711
At nade that immobilized and destroyed the gun of both tanks....
Posts: 469
Posts: 469
Posts: 711
Get Isu,
See tiger on the battlefield
Ram tiger
Isu finishes off tiger
???????????????????????????????????
Posts: 54
Ram is one of those things I'd like to see reworked, it's currently more damaging to the T-34 in all scenarios except for a few very niche:
- A base inspection by an unsupported vehicle where you have at least one anti-tank platform that can clean up before the tank you rammed kills your T-34.
- Your T-34 is one shot from death and you do not have time to pull back, so you go for a ram and hope the enemy tank misses or bounces the next shot before your suicide attack commences.
I haven't given a lot of thought as to what it should be, but punishing you by removing your movement, gun, and 25% of your health is way too harsh for a stun and engine damage on the other vehicle.
 |
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
