Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Not error prone if you are deliberately using a convoluted method so it can yield the results you want. I mean... Whos first thought for testing movement speed is a triangle pattern?
Posts: 1794
How about conscripts starting at a target size of 1.087, while grens start at .91 and pgrens start at .8?
Posts: 1794
That looks like problem with pathfinding when using multiple waypoints.
Still, i'm with you. WHO THE HELL makes a triangle path to test speed of units.
Posts: 1979
Posts: 999 | Subs: 1
I will retry with parallel lines.
I mean i did select both squads and click same time to move. I tried various distances and possibilities. Somehow cons just is faster to reach always. Maybe is larger squad size and the first 2 man reach earlier?
How can i do better with parallel lines, does it include a timer?
Posts: 4474
Another one of mrgame2s retarded threads...
5. Grens have a longer range faust
Katitof-2018
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
?????
both are 20 range rho, and faust is super buggy
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Con AT nade has 20 range, with a non-working bulletin.
Gren Faust has 30 range, with a bulletin that increases it to 32 range. A main strength of the faction.
Volk Faust has 20 range, which IMO makes OKW worst off because of the chance for it to misfire.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3260
Con AT nade has 20 range, with a non-working bulletin.
Gren Faust has 30 range, with a bulletin that increases it to 32 range. A main strength of the faction.
Volk Faust has 20 range, which IMO makes OKW worst off because of the chance for it to misfire.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
They all seem to be 15 to me.
Posts: 3260
No. Grens, Fallschirmjäger and Panzerfüsiliers have extra range on their snares compared to the standard 20.
Posts: 416 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1794
Another one of mrgame2s retarded threads...
1. Cons lose at max range
2. Cons have to be in cover
3. Cons lose at max and midrange at vet 0
4. Grens have a better nade
5. Grens have a longer range faust
Posts: 1794
About snares: there's a difference between weapon range and ability range.
The grenadier faust does have longer weapon range (30), but it doesn't matter, since the ability's range is shorter (18, I think).
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
About snares: there's a difference between weapon range and ability range.
The grenadier faust does have longer weapon range (30), but it doesn't matter, since the ability's range is shorter (18, I think).
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Cons high starting ra is by design to balance its bigger squad
Posts: 1794
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Interesting but i dont get it.
So larger target size helps the merge because it is closer to the other units?
So thats also why cons appear to move faster to me. The unit is larger and cover a larger area?
Make sense?
So i was right so say cons have an advantage in closing down to engage/flank faster, especially for snaring?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Interesting but i dont get it.
So larger target size helps the merge because it is closer to the other units?
So thats also why cons appear to move faster to me. The unit is larger and cover a larger area?
Make sense?
So i was right so say cons have an advantage in closing down to engage/flank faster, especially for snaring?
Posts: 1979
Hence i suggest to make cons ra better at vet0 and lower its vet3 bonus.
Right now vetted 7man cons bully vetted lmg grens. faction
Another issue with wehr weakest late game
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
