Poll: How are grens after the rifle buff?
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedGrens are more than fine, they function perfectly now alongside pgrens and assgrens. Not sure why the poll exists.
Because rifles were buffed and grens and rifles were fine, volks were the offending unit yet they barely got changed. So it may be likely that rifles are too good vs grens.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Because rifles were buffed and grens and rifles were fine, volks were the offending unit yet they barely got changed. So it may be likely that rifles are too good vs grens.
Volks were never the “offending unit”, which is why they only got a 10mp cost increase.
As for Grens, rifles got a close range dps buff, so absolutely nothing changed for grens since you’re never supposed to fight rifles up close with them.
Like I said, this thread is pointless.
Posts: 5279
Posts: 3053
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 556
Posts: 1289
Volks were never the “offending unit”, which is why they only got a 10mp cost increase.
As for Grens, rifles got a close range dps buff, so absolutely nothing changed for grens since you’re never supposed to fight rifles up close with them.
Like I said, this thread is pointless.
Imo stg volks screwed up the inf balance big time.
Stg volks single handedly forced the penal change and other main lines that powercreped up. Leaving grens to bite the dust. Volks became grenadiers wet dream for a 15 mp increase.
Out of all the main line for 250mp/25 now 260mp 25 volls have sandbags, non droppable ai upgrade for all ranges and faust with first truck, better molotov, salvage to deney wiped team weapon and tanks, self heal with vet.
While having the strongest engineer, a backkapping scout car, a atgun in the same t0. Also have an mg in that tier after 1st tech. Also having true elite inf non doc wich come earlier now, and a non doc super heavy.
So why in hell do volks need to be so cost effevtive self reliant and durable with all that in their faction?
All other main line have real trade offs on the selfs or in the faction.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
So why in hell do volks need to be so cost effevtive self reliant and durable with all that in their faction?
All other main line have real trade offs on the selfs or in the faction.
Because they straight up lose to Riflemen, Infantry Sections and Penals and are about equal to 7 man Conscripts. Plus they don't have great support weapons to surround them with.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Regarding the opening poll. Grens are fine against Soviets and UKF, it's just USF that overperforms in general. There will be nerfs to USF soon because the big 1v1 tourney is near so let's just see how things are after the next patches.
You do realize that even with that rifle buff, rifle-gren dynamics are completely unchanged? Grens still lose at all distances, as they are meant to.
You have most powerful support units and sniper for a reason there.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
You do realize that even with that rifle buff, rifle-gren dynamics are completely unchanged? Grens still lose at all distances, as they are meant to.
You have most powerful support units and sniper for a reason there.
How does this relate to what I just wrote
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
How does this relate to what I just wrote
It means that regardless of rifle or gren state, grens are supposed to lose at all distances and they do, rifle buff didn't changed anything here.
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Imo stg volks screwed up the inf balance big time.
Stg volks single handedly forced the penal change and other main lines that powercreped up. ...
To be accurate Penal change and VG changes happened at the same patch.
And actually penal was so broken at the time (and remained broken for 6 months) that no none paid enough attention to VGs.
But I do agree that VGs and Penal created a powercreep that lead to the majority of infantry being buffed.
Posts: 1289
Because they straight up lose to Riflemen, Infantry Sections and Penals and are about equal to 7 man Conscripts. Plus they don't have great support weapons to surround them with.
so non doc super heavy, non doc elite inf, strongest engineerr, self heal, hard forward healing and retreat dont count? The mg34 is still better then a maxim btw.
Just because they loose or break even to more expensive counterparts, is no reason to have them this cost effective and able to tackle what they do currently. Esp with the above mentioned of the faction as a whole.
Posts: 4474
Posts: 1289
To be accurate Penal change and VG changes happened at the same patch.
And actually penal was so broken at the time (and remained broken for 6 months) that no none paid enough attention to VGs.
But I do agree that VGs and Penal created a powercreep that lead to the majority of infantry being buffed.
I thought the volks change happend before the penals. The maxim nerf in its golden days revaeled maxims kept stg volks in check.
But i could be wrong about the time when penals got changed.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I thought the volks change happend before the penals. The maxim nerf in its golden days revaeled maxims kept stg volks in check.
But i could be wrong about the time when penals got changed.
Both change happened:
JUNE 21st BALANCE UPDATE
Livestreams
179 | |||||
18 | |||||
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.613220.736+7
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Xclusive
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM