Login

russian armor

Fallshirmjager vs Shock Troopes vs Paratroopers

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (4)down
24 Sep 2019, 18:36 PM
#41
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 16:59 PMgbem


Sidetech vs free stuff from teching...

Why is it that axis somehow gets free shit from teching while the allies have to sidetech to get the goodstuff :v
cause they pay more with tech ? we had this discussion some time ago u keep ignoring it

https://www.coh2.org/topic/96750/redirect-thread-faction-teching-and-timing
24 Sep 2019, 18:39 PM
#42
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 15:36 PMKirrik


Because calling Glider is comparable to teching? Also this entire thread is retarded, Commandos with brens should shred Falls at any ranges as they come later and require much higher investment than Falls to reach same power levels and scale worse with vet and you can't spam 3-4 squads of them casually like people do with Falls.

Anyway a squad that can win against dedicated long range units such as paras and guards and at the same time win against elite CQC units like rangers while having bundle, WP, stealth, ambush, faust and paradrop is the ultimate joke, one can argue that this time balance team went farther than JLI
again with ur lies they lose vs dedicated units


stop spouting lies as always , is this like the ostwind vs centaur where i did the test and u said i rigged them ? when u showed nothing ?
24 Sep 2019, 19:00 PM
#43
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

they don't

are u so drained for arguments that u have to make up stuff ?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtaBecIom0&t=1500s

Is tightrope rigging tests then? Because even without any vet Falls can almost take out Paratrooper squad
24 Sep 2019, 19:02 PM
#44
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:00 PMKirrik



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtaBecIom0&t=1675s

Is tightrope rigging tests then? Because even without any vet Falls can almost take out Paratrooper squad
so they lost right ? are u saying that losing is now winning ? are u that biased ?
24 Sep 2019, 19:04 PM
#45
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

so they lost right ? are u saying that losing is now winning ? are u that biased ?


Falls are weakest at vet0 and come earlier than Paras, thats not even counting their cheapness and ambush camo. Now comibine 2 plus 2 and figure out who's gonna win in real game
24 Sep 2019, 19:08 PM
#46
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:04 PMKirrik


Falls are weakest at vet0 and come earlier than Paras, thats not even counting their cheapness and ambush camo. Now comibine 2 plus 2 and figure out who's gonna win in real game
well u can do some test and post them, i did mine and posted them, unlike u saying LIES as Always
24 Sep 2019, 19:10 PM
#47
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

well u can do some test and post them, i did mine and posted them, unlike u saying LIES as Always


That test had falls models all focused by Paras 1 by 1 and Paras still barely managed to survive against vet zero Falls. You're so in denial it's kinda pathetic
24 Sep 2019, 19:16 PM
#48
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:10 PMKirrik


That test had falls models all focused by Paras 1 by 1 and Paras still barely managed to survive against vet zero Falls. You're so in denial it's kinda pathetic


>falls beat para at long range

> we have test

>well they actaully don't beat para, but it was close

>it's not me saying lies it's u



A Narcissist's Prayer

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did...

You deserved it.
24 Sep 2019, 19:22 PM
#49
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573



>falls beat para at long range

> we have test

>well they actaully don't beat para, but it was close

>it's not me saying lies it's u



A Narcissist's Prayer

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did...

You deserved it.


Have you forgotten to take your pills lately? Falls have no buisness taking on dedicated long range 6 man elite infantry like that, they are not Obers. If they had ambush bonus on or had any vet (which they should as they come earlier) they would've beaten Paras. Heck I managed to do that in live game against not only USF paras but also Soviet ones and Guards.
24 Sep 2019, 19:29 PM
#50
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:22 PMKirrik


Have you forgotten to take your pills lately? Falls have no buisness taking on dedicated long range 6 man elite infantry like that, they are not Obers. If they had ambush bonus on or had any vet (which they should as they come earlier) they would've beaten Paras. Heck I managed to do that in live game against not only USF paras but also Soviet ones and Guards.
like vet 1 or 2 that give no combat bonus :snfPeter::snfPeter:

show them please ?
24 Sep 2019, 19:45 PM
#51
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

u know a glider only cost 40 mp and is basically a reinforce bunker that cost 125 mp + 60 mun ?


No kidding. I like that you can call it in at a hot spot and reinforce as you are fighting.
Id be quite upset if the glider was nixed. It's unique AND fun
24 Sep 2019, 19:47 PM
#52
avatar of Alphrum

Posts: 808

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:22 PMKirrik


Have you forgotten to take your pills lately? Falls have no buisness taking on dedicated long range 6 man elite infantry like that, they are not Obers. If they had ambush bonus on or had any vet (which they should as they come earlier) they would've beaten Paras. Heck I managed to do that in live game against not only USF paras but also Soviet ones and Guards.


falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf
24 Sep 2019, 19:50 PM
#53
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

like vet 1 or 2 that give no combat bonus :snfPeter::snfPeter:

show them please ?


Like vet 3 0.59 RA. But they dont need that as Ambush bonuses are enough to gib any infantry in game (even at low vet). In any case you can stop screeching about Falls being totally not overpowered as they are confirmed to get nerfed anyway.
24 Sep 2019, 19:51 PM
#54
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:47 PMAlphrum


falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf


They are most certanly not supposed to be challenging long-ranged elites at long distances (which they currently do, and thats where balance team clearly screwed up)
24 Sep 2019, 19:57 PM
#55
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:47 PMAlphrum


falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf

No, they are supposed to be ambush infiltration squad.
If you want to blob strong infantry, nothing will replace obers.
24 Sep 2019, 20:00 PM
#56
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:51 PMKirrik


They are most certanly not supposed to be challenging long-ranged elites at long distances (which they currently do, and thats where balance team clearly screwed up)

should commandos supposed to be challenging long-ranged elites at long distances?
24 Sep 2019, 20:06 PM
#57
avatar of Alphrum

Posts: 808

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:57 PMKatitof

No, they are supposed to be ambush infiltration squad.
If you want to blob strong infantry, nothing will replace obers.


from the patch thread

"Fallschirmjäger have not been very popular due to their high cost, timing and being outclassed by Obersoldaten. Changes have been made to allow them to arrive sooner and scale better with veterancy and tech, at the cost of having less firepower upon deployment."

They are clearly being compared to obers. And if you played the game, you'd know they don't infiltrate anymore.
24 Sep 2019, 20:07 PM
#58
avatar of gbem

Posts: 1979

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 19:47 PMAlphrum


falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf


Then remove stealth and faust
24 Sep 2019, 20:07 PM
#59
avatar of Alphrum

Posts: 808

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 20:07 PMgbem


Then remove stealth and faust


make them 6 man too like paras? ok deal
24 Sep 2019, 20:19 PM
#60
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Sep 2019, 20:07 PMAlphrum


make them 6 man too like paras? ok deal

"they are an alternative to Obers!"
Then if they are going to be like Obers in firepower remove the extra utility
"then make them as durable as paras!"

Get your shit straight....
PAGES (4)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 6
United States 39
United States 11

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

783 users are online: 1 member and 782 guests
Gbpirate
0 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49123
Welcome our newest member, monopolygou4gm
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM