Posts: 4474
cause they pay more with tech ? we had this discussion some time ago u keep ignoring it
Sidetech vs free stuff from teching...
Why is it that axis somehow gets free shit from teching while the allies have to sidetech to get the goodstuff :v
Katitof-2018
Posts: 4474
again with ur lies they lose vs dedicated units
Because calling Glider is comparable to teching? Also this entire thread is retarded, Commandos with brens should shred Falls at any ranges as they come later and require much higher investment than Falls to reach same power levels and scale worse with vet and you can't spam 3-4 squads of them casually like people do with Falls.
Anyway a squad that can win against dedicated long range units such as paras and guards and at the same time win against elite CQC units like rangers while having bundle, WP, stealth, ambush, faust and paradrop is the ultimate joke, one can argue that this time balance team went farther than JLI
Katitof-2018
Posts: 573
they don't
are u so drained for arguments that u have to make up stuff ?
Posts: 4474
so they lost right ? are u saying that losing is now winning ? are u that biased ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtaBecIom0&t=1675s
Is tightrope rigging tests then? Because even without any vet Falls can almost take out Paratrooper squad
Katitof-2018
Posts: 573
so they lost right ? are u saying that losing is now winning ? are u that biased ?
Posts: 4474
well u can do some test and post them, i did mine and posted them, unlike u saying LIES as Always
Falls are weakest at vet0 and come earlier than Paras, thats not even counting their cheapness and ambush camo. Now comibine 2 plus 2 and figure out who's gonna win in real game
Katitof-2018
Posts: 573
well u can do some test and post them, i did mine and posted them, unlike u saying LIES as Always
Posts: 4474
That test had falls models all focused by Paras 1 by 1 and Paras still barely managed to survive against vet zero Falls. You're so in denial it's kinda pathetic
Katitof-2018
Posts: 573
>falls beat para at long range
> we have test
>well they actaully don't beat para, but it was close
>it's not me saying lies it's u
A Narcissist's Prayer
That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did...
You deserved it.
Posts: 4474
like vet 1 or 2 that give no combat bonus
Have you forgotten to take your pills lately? Falls have no buisness taking on dedicated long range 6 man elite infantry like that, they are not Obers. If they had ambush bonus on or had any vet (which they should as they come earlier) they would've beaten Paras. Heck I managed to do that in live game against not only USF paras but also Soviet ones and Guards.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 5279
u know a glider only cost 40 mp and is basically a reinforce bunker that cost 125 mp + 60 mun ?
Posts: 808
Have you forgotten to take your pills lately? Falls have no buisness taking on dedicated long range 6 man elite infantry like that, they are not Obers. If they had ambush bonus on or had any vet (which they should as they come earlier) they would've beaten Paras. Heck I managed to do that in live game against not only USF paras but also Soviet ones and Guards.
Posts: 573
like vet 1 or 2 that give no combat bonus
show them please ?
Posts: 573
falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 54
They are most certanly not supposed to be challenging long-ranged elites at long distances (which they currently do, and thats where balance team clearly screwed up)
Posts: 808
No, they are supposed to be ambush infiltration squad.
If you want to blob strong infantry, nothing will replace obers.
Posts: 1979
falls are supposed to be an alternative to obers, they are elite AI inf
Posts: 808
Then remove stealth and faust
Posts: 5279
make them 6 man too like paras? ok deal
 |
|
|
48 | ||
|
|
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
