Login

russian armor

Random faction choice for matchmaking

22 Sep 2019, 22:33 PM
#1
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54

Why don't we have random faction selection option like in coh1? it would help for queue times
There are lot of people(including me) who play all armies
I don't think it would be hard to implement
22 Sep 2019, 23:02 PM
#2
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3046 | Subs: 3

Im pretty sure a Relic Coder would be required to implement this, so the community can't do it
22 Sep 2019, 23:04 PM
#3
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54

Im pretty sure a Relic Coder would be required to implement this, so the community can't do it

Yeah ofc, I meant relic devs
------------------------------
One could add an option to choose more than one factions to queue with, but that's different story
22 Sep 2019, 23:09 PM
#4
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3046 | Subs: 3


Yeah ofc, I meant relic devs


You know that there is only 1 Relic employee still working on CoH2, right? And I don't know if he is a coder.
22 Sep 2019, 23:10 PM
#5
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54



You know that there is only 1 Relic employee still working on CoH2, right? And I don't know if he is a coder.

didn't know that :D
nvm then
23 Sep 2019, 18:40 PM
#6
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

I don't think it would be hard to implement


Every time an user post this, a developer team gets an aneurysm.
23 Sep 2019, 18:53 PM
#7
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

I think the difficulty would be the loadouts created for each faction. You would need an entirely overhauled display to be able to equip basically 5 loadouts at once. This is probably why the game did not get this option when previous games like DOW 2 had it.

It would also require a major update to the matchmaking algorithm which currently has no random players to account for.

In terms of money/man hours it would probably cost more than the upcoming tournament by a wide margin.

I would like random matchmaking though :guyokay:
23 Sep 2019, 19:40 PM
#8
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

I think the difficulty would be the loadouts created for each faction. You would need an entirely overhauled display to be able to equip basically 5 loadouts at once. This is probably why the game did not get this option when previous games like DOW 2 had it.

It would also require a major update to the matchmaking algorithm which currently has no random players to account for.

In terms of money/man hours it would probably cost more than the upcoming tournament by a wide margin.

I would like random matchmaking though :guyokay:


Exactly. The only thing you could do now, is brainstorming how a random matchmaking should look and work towards future CoH3.

Having a random option should also help towards matchmaking.
23 Sep 2019, 20:17 PM
#9
avatar of Doomlord52

Posts: 960

Well, you could do it the lazy way.

1. Select the "random" faction (new 6th faction icon)
2. Your player card is covered with dice or something (doesn't matter what, just hide it)
3. The game has actually picked a faction now (client side), and is using whatever loadout you have as default for that faction (i.e. the one that's selected when you switch manually).
4. Queue as that faction

True "random" faction selection (like in SC2) doesn't really make sense in CoH2. There are no mixed teams (you're always the opposite faction-side of the other team), there's no "random start" locations to scout, and build orders aren't hyper optimized to the point where you can win/lose a game before seeing a single enemy unit.

This 'lazy' solution fixes the problem of you not deciding what team to play as with minimal effort from devs. It also wouldn't be hard to expand it to arranged teams (just cover everyone's cards).

Also, if it was implemented as a new faction, in theory, they could replace the loading screen player card with a 'dice' card as well; creating some sense of 'random selection' for other players as well.
23 Sep 2019, 20:33 PM
#10
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2



This suggestion would lose out on one of the main benefits of queueing random - decreased queue times. With random, you can match into an either an axis or allied player -whichever matchmaker needs. With your proposed implementation, you can only match into one of the two.

The difference basically boils down to the fact that what people are asking for is an "all" option, and what you proposed is actually an "any" option.
23 Sep 2019, 20:42 PM
#11
avatar of Doomlord52

Posts: 960

This suggestion would lose out on one of the main benefits of queueing random - decreased queue times. With random, you can match into an either an axis or allied player -whichever matchmaker needs. With your proposed implementation, you can only match into one of the two.

The difference basically boils down to the fact that what people are asking for is an "all" option, and what you proposed is actually an "any" option.


I hadn't considered that. I don't find queue times all that long, so I didn't think that was a factor. I suppose it could check which side has fewer players in queue, and simply select a random faction (still hidden) on that side.

In any event, my suggestion is only for a 'lazy' implementation that requires no changes to the MM-system or other server-side code.
23 Sep 2019, 21:24 PM
#12
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

The lazy implementation is just asking OP to have a dice right besides his keyboard so he can roll whatever faction to play.

The point of random should be both to shorten up queue and improve matchmaking by actually finding the most suitable opponent possible.

Example: say your best faction is OH, followed by SU and then OKW. If the best closest match up is against someone who is an allied faction, which in turn is worst than you, the game should probably put you as OKW. If he is better, OH.
23 Sep 2019, 22:11 PM
#13
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958



Exactly. The only thing you could do now, is brainstorming how a random matchmaking should look and work towards future CoH3.

Having a random option should also help towards matchmaking.


Instead of all the complexity of having the computer have to look up multiple loadouts, all players randomly selected as Soviet should be randomly assigned Tank Hunter Tactics for their commander. Would be great.





23 Sep 2019, 22:21 PM
#14
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

The lazy implementation is just asking OP to have a dice right besides his keyboard so he can roll whatever faction to play.

The point of random should be both to shorten up queue and improve matchmaking by actually finding the most suitable opponent possible.

Example: say your best faction is OH, followed by SU and then OKW. If the best closest match up is against someone who is an allied faction, which in turn is worst than you, the game should probably put you as OKW. If he is better, OH.


This is probably correct, but also why coding it could turn into a nightmare. In a random system, the matchmaker would now see you as five different players. Also, if you want to queue 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4 at the same time, you would be fifteen different players.

IIRC, players had a separate ranking for random automatch, which would make matchmaking simpler.
23 Sep 2019, 23:29 PM
#15
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Sep 2019, 22:21 PMGrumpy


This is probably correct, but also why coding it could turn into a nightmare. In a random system, the matchmaker would now see you as five different players. Also, if you want to queue 2v2, 3v3, and 4v4 at the same time, you would be fifteen different players.

IIRC, players had a separate ranking for random automatch, which would make matchmaking simpler.


In the current matchmaking yes.
It could be simplified as well as only Allies or Axis and picking a random faction. Or the average ranking for Allies/Axis. Or just your best faction at all for that side.

If it's too much issue for queuing for several modes, you could just disable random search for when you queue for more than 1 mode.

24 Sep 2019, 09:50 AM
#16
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54

well I am not a game developer but simplest thing that comes to my mind(lets say for 2 factions) is to
add another copy of a player in both sides of matchmaking queue with a reference to eachother, first one that finds a game deletes other and joins the game

they can simply look how it is implemented in coh 1 tho.
24 Sep 2019, 11:38 AM
#17
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2



they can simply look how it is implemented in coh 1 tho.

Theres no guarantee that said implementation would work with coh2 though. The way matchmaker was built up could be different entirely.
24 Sep 2019, 12:44 PM
#18
avatar of elnur009

Posts: 54


Theres no guarantee that said implementation would work with coh2 though. The way matchmaker was built up could be different entirely.

could be
but I don't think they built matchmaking system from 0
there has to be lot of logical similarities in algorithm
24 Sep 2019, 13:14 PM
#19
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2


could be
but I don't think they built matchmaking system from 0
there has to be lot of logical similarities in algorithm

The concern is less about the algorithm and more just about...how they coded it. The way they coded the matchmaker could make random near impossible without heavy adjustments.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
09 Apr 2025, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
09 Apr 2025, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

349 users are online: 349 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53785
Welcome our newest member, tk88ae_com
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM