Posts: 960
- increase vet requirement by 20%
- increase cost to 340 (?) mp
- increase muni cost of FG42 to 80 muni
Perfect! still terminators at vet5 but you can't field 3+ squads with FG42 so easily
Posts: 810
paras win at any range vs fallies...and have 3-4 models left..
Posts: 808
USF para : 6man 3cp 380mp need weapon upgrade 120muni(2 LMG), 90muni(4 smg), no AT snare
OKW falls : 4man 2cp 320mp need weapon upgrade 60muni(2 FG42), have AT snare
paras win falls beacause paras is more expensive than falls
dont whining
falls comes early and easy to use than paras(timing, cost, using camo, HAVE AT SNARE)
Falls now has no weaknesses
i know you are just fucking axis fan boy but dont ignore the truth
Posts: 808
They should beat falls. Cost more to buy and to upgrade, and don't get a snare. What's your point...
Posts: 2243
Falls beating squads that cost less = OP needs nerf
Paras beating squads that cost less = Fine, supposed to
Take your bias glasses off
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
same ppls: its ok that paras shred fallies with 4 models left..because they are more expansive...
Falls beating squads that cost less = OP needs nerf
Paras beating squads that cost less = Fine, supposed to
Take your bias glasses off
Falls needs a price increase though,
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
lol..exactly this OP and other whiners...
wah..my cheaper nondoc squad get shredd by 3 more expansive doc AI specialist fallies ....MUST BE NERF!
same ppls: its ok that paras shred fallies with 4 models left..because they are more expansive...
so lol
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 5279
Does that mean will you now shut up about guards and shocks?
Posts: 2243
Does that mean will you now shut up about guards and shocks?
Posts: 3053
This, combined with removing faust.
The AI performance would actually be pretty justified with those changes.
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 808
Still ignoring the fact that falls have a snare I see. They don't deserve a faust with all that AI power at 320mp
Also you:
??? Make up your mind....
Btw they didn't JUST increase JLI cost, they also nerfed them
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
And regarding JLI, get your facts straight the nerfs they got didnt touch ther performance at all.
"Cost increased from 250 manpower to 280
Deployment cooldown increased to 100 seconds.
G43 upgrade cost increased from 45 to 60
We will continue to monitor the performance of this unit"
Posts: 888
Posts: 2358
I'm only saying they're too cheap for a squad with that level of AI and a faust
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
compared to what, you feelings?
There are not many elite doctrtinal units with snare to begin with.
Also your cost increase has a vital flaw, Fjaegers are alredy a heavy MP investment, raising it wont change at all how they are used, therefore pointless.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 107
Posts: 888
I think USF benefits a lot from heavy tanks being locked behind tech. Luchs-Puma-Command Panther and T70 into IS2 were the best strarts in 1v1 and 2v2. Yes you could do something similar with USF LVs into Pershing but none of the USF LVs are as suited as T70 and Puma for this job.
Riflemen buff was completely uncalled for because Riflemen were already good in previous patch. It was just OKW early game that needed fixing. Now OKW early game got weakened and Riflemen buffed. Just not a good combination when USF was always good vs Wehrmacht.
Posts: 888
Well, anyway, Fallschirmjagers and Valiant Assault can be more OP combinations.
Most of the time, a combination of the two can easily break the balance.
Posts: 184
Please, Riflemen were complete garbage (and they still kind of are). You have to spend 150 MP/15 fuel and 120 munitions just to stay ahead of Volksgrenadiers. Anyone who says Riflemen were good never played USF.
 |
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
293 | ||
 |
|
|
168 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
