Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
it's u who responded to me first tho, i was not adressing u
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
cause other "feels" i don't see anything here
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
so u are saying it should be worse than centaur ?
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
clutter
anyway u said
"I would just reduce its damage output a little"
that mean reducing it's AI which right now is the same as centaur
Posts: 4474
u couls just nerf the speed and increase the armor to 160
Yup. But as I have been saying for the last several pages i think the Ostwind is slightly better overall because of mobility. And going back to Shadows point about AOE, ill take ostwind over centaur currently
So saying nerf the Ostwind doesn't mean make it worse than the centaur, if i already think Ostwind is sightly better....
You clearly disagree, i don't get what you're struggling to understand tho
Katitof-2018
Posts: 2358
Then you disagree and that's fine, just say that instead of whining about what people have said about p4 and cromwell
I would just reduce its damage output a little, not by much. I'm with Shadow, it's not crazy OP but the buffs just went a tad too far
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Posts: 785
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
I honestly just think the veterancy should be toned down now that its base performance is so good. That goes for the OKW Ostwind especially.
Besides that, watching VonIvan with his double Ostwind strat lock down the field is a little concerning, though I think the issue there is more on how easy it is for Ostheer to skip tier 1 and 2 than how OP the Ostwind might be by itself.
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned Posts: 2358
Yup. But as I have been saying for the last several pages i think the Ostwind is slightly better overall because of mobility. And going back to Shadows point about AOE, ill take ostwind over centaur currently
So saying nerf the Ostwind doesn't mean make it worse than the centaur, if i already think Ostwind is sightly better....
You clearly disagree, i don't get what you're struggling to understand tho
No one can prove anything
...
Ostwind is better in my opinion, that's all. You can disagree, but you're opinion is just as much a "feeling" as anyone elses
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
I told you cant prove ostwinds being better because of their speed and you clearly gave up trying.
Posts: 1487
Don’t engage the Ostwind in a stand off duel with LVs. Force it to move since it has poor accuracy when mobile.
Ostwind’s primary role is to kill infantry, but it’s other roles are anti-air and anti-light.
Also, Stuarts and AEC are not meant to take down the Ostwind alone, they need support as the Ostwind still has tank health at 640 with somewhat alright armour and arrives later than they do.
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 818
3rd game of noggano-devm. Ostwind OP. Its timing is OP
Axis won big majority of tournament games partly cuz of pre-LV fuel denial. Better watch those games and adjust
| Playercard of Hon3y | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1487
I think the ostwind had it's moments but it didn't seem too strong From what i saw in NA.
I do know Noganno likes rushing Ostwind though, do you have a link to that series? I can't find the VOD in WUFFS channel though i was told he casted it.
| Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 2358
Or maybe I just don't care about your opinion anymore? Your posts are mostly filled with trolling anyway bud, not much else
I'm sorry you don't like my opinion on the ostwind. Didn't think such a tiny nerf could make somebody wine so much
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
There is nothing good about going personal, yet you keep going for personal accusations when i debunk your points.
 |
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
