Jackson needs some more buffs

1.1 Spamming
Creating multiple posts/threads/trending/replays/shouts with the same content is not allowed.

1.4 Excessive trolling
Excessively seeking attention or attempting to provoke other users is not allowed.

1.5 Offensive content
Any content that is considered as offensive may be removed and the user may be banned for up to 7 days.
As an example, posting pictures of violent criminals without a proper reason is not allowed, since it might cause offence.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 13:00 PMStug life

and is ignoring other response and completely skip them and continuing ur propaganda allowed (like what codguy is going ignoring any posted stats about rifle man)? in a way it should be considered trolling

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 13:08 PMKatitof

To shut this offtopic down now, I'll say this:

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 13:25 PMWingZero

I dont see how players can complain about Jackson when Axis has plenty of AT options. Its disingenuous to say Jackson spam is OP when Axis players can do the same with Panthers and heavy tanks in large game modes.

Yes medium tanks struggle against Jackson but that makes perfect sense when P4 is designed to fight BOTH infantry and AT. Jackson is strictly AT with no AI capability. Medium tanks shouldn't be able to fight Jackson easily AND have AI capabilities I dont care what the tech cost is.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 07:08 AMEsxile

Your suggestion is stupid.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 06:18 AMDoomlord52

So one of the slowest tanks in the game, and a unit that's rarely used outside of team-games (where it can be a problem in packs of 4+).

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 16:03 PMSkysTheLimit

Thanks dude, I appreciate it

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 16:51 PMEsxile

You're welcome.

I don't know what wrong with you guys to always, every single time, make a proposal to change something every time someone open a topic about X unit.
But I think the most stupid proposal that come on every single thread is the basic -Yeah let's increase/decrease its price by X and that's fine.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 13:52 PMthedarkarmadillo

Issues with another faction doesn't not excuse issues with this one. You could argue that the extra speed, health and armour on the panther is needed to combat jacksons as a p4 can cut it.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 17:32 PMWingZero

What does that even mean? What I am saying is people are complaining that Jackson shuts down medium tank and therefore Jackson needs to be nerfed is stupid. P4s can fight both AI and AT while Jackson is pure AT choice.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 17:32 PMWingZero

What does that even mean? What I am saying is people are complaining that Jackson shuts down medium tank and therefore Jackson needs to be nerfed is stupid. P4s can fight both AI and AT while Jackson is pure AT choice.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 23:15 PMdistrofio

I think people are complaining about jacsons having way too good stats compared to the other ALLIED options, comparing its FU cost compared AXIS panthers and heavy tanks and given the fact that USF players never rely on the other EXISTING AT options in the faction, simply because jacksons solve tank fights FAR more efficiently and effectively and probably (and im not going to count it) with the new tech rework, heavy tanks will become harder to get and easier to counter with jacksons.

I have read all the threads about the discussion, if it were for a single of the three mentioned issues, there would be no need to nerf jacksons.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 09:40 AMSeductiveCardbordBox

I mean. The jackson is uniquely disadvantaged when fighting unsupported because it has a gimped LoS. It can't chase because it can't self spot and it can't well defend itself alone because it can't see anything.

That is, in ny book, a proper weakness. Not as crippling as the casemate lack of turrets, but it also costs more than an su85, and the su85 not only has normal sight but two different ways to improve on it.

Saying it has no weaknesses it a little disingenuous.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 23:26 PMKatitof

Other factions have AT guns that don't require constant muni dumps to actually do their job, so US has to make up somewhere else in AT department.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2019, 22:19 PMthedarkarmadillo

problems with panther balance doesn't mean the Jackson isn't overperforming and it doesn't excuse it. The su85, firefly, jp4 all can also only fight tanks and do nothing to infantry but they don't get a free pass to go against balance.

Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2019, 08:14 AMRocket

Mmkay when okw always manages to have their super p4 by the time i have a reg sherman ( that cant fight it) i have to wait longer to get the jackson? Or should i hope i went captain and rely on my unreliable at gun lmao, if i was the axis player id probably just rush the at gun and wipe it then they are screwed