Where is your proof?
What do i need to prove? What he stated is on a few pages back.
Posts: 1289
Where is your proof?
Posts: 911
What do i need to prove? What he stated is on a few pages back.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 466
Posts: 1096
its 2019 and they don't have a single weapon upgrade. every other factions main starting infantry have weapon upgrades. at least give them one dp-28. even if you have to increase there cost. they don't even scale mid game let alone late game.
Posts: 5279
A good test would be to add a commander which allows you to upgrade Cons with a DP28 and go from there.
Posts: 770
its 2019 and they don't have a single weapon upgrade. every other factions main starting infantry have weapon upgrades. at least give them one dp-28. even if you have to increase there cost. they don't even scale mid game let alone late game.
Posts: 1484
Posts: 1289
Perhaps if you don't have to post proof, neither does he?
Posts: 711
Posts: 1096
Cons are already the only core unit in the game that is nearly worthless without a proper commander, adding another commander only buff doesn't fix that.
Posts: 5279
I agree. What I meant re a commander only upgrade at first was then we could see what difference it made on a smaller and safer scale. No need for a new commander, just swap the ability onto one of the the 74 unused soviet commanders we already have.
Or just make them Con-struppen and lower the price.
Posts: 2358
Posts: 2358
its 2019 and they don't have a single weapon upgrade. every other factions main starting infantry have weapon upgrades. at least give them one dp-28. even if you have to increase there cost. they don't even scale mid game let alone late game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Reduce cons cost. Next patch cons get nerfed bcos they become too cost effective. Then cons get cost reduction again. Repeat loop until cost reaches 0 or cons get removed from the actual game.
41 | |||||
111 | |||||
7 | |||||
4 | |||||
3 |