Convince me that it's a bad idea with a 1 sniper limit
Posts: 606
But seriously though, I've had four matches tonight where people have gone with at least two snipers at the same time. I've won some of them and lost others, but what they all had in common is that it's such an unfunny and annoying thing to fight against, especially for factions with small squad sizes.
I know that they take a lot of micro and are big investments, but honestly a-moving two snipers around the map is not that much more difficult and can take an enormous strain on the opponent with really agressive deep dives.
I would never dream of going double sniper because it sets you up for a really boring rigid play of plucking away opponents manpower at a low effort double rate.
After playing against this match after match after gardening match all night I really think they should have a limit of 1 on the field at the time for each player.
But perhaps I'm just spitting salt here
Posts: 955
Posts: 600
Posts: 606
Ok but only if we limit machine guns and mortars, emplacements and bunkers aswell. Not to speak of elite infantry. Deal?
nope
Or I mean, it depends on what you think the limit should be and why.
Posts: 955
Ok but only if we limit machine guns and mortars, emplacements and bunkers aswell. Not to speak of elite infantry. Deal?
MG guns are effectively countered by mortars. Those are countered by moving mainlines, who in return get countered by MGs
Snipers are meant to be countered by LVs but those are absolutely useles against them
Posts: 600
"Snipers are meant to be countered by LVs but those are absolutely useles against them"
Em what? Ever seen a m20 chase down a sniper? Guess good ol Friedrich has a different opininion on that
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
If there's ever going to be a CoH3, I would really like for snipers to be changed into 2-3 men recon squads with great sight range, camo and some utility but have no real combat power. Perhaps with a munitions-based sniping ability (like Brits Infantry Section in vCoH).
Recon should become an integral part of the game. Snipers that ignore the fundamental cover-based mechanics should no longer be part of the game.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 600
Posts: 3053
Not to 1 each. Like 2 of each thing^^
"Snipers are meant to be countered by LVs but those are absolutely useles against them"
Em what? Ever seen a m20 chase down a sniper? Guess good ol Friedrich has a different opininion on that
If you really let a sniper get chased down by an M20 (which also only has 320 health with skirts) with mainline infantry that have the fastest and longest range snare in the game (and have it from the get go) you've messed up pretty bad.
Posts: 783
Posts: 606
Remove snipers ability to auto attack. Snipers have the ability to eliminate a single model for a small munitions cost(10-15) with a lengthy cooldown-30 seconds to a minute, reduced by vet. Give snipers shared veterancy. Reduce sniper cost to 120 mp and 3 supply, making them a cheap spotting unit for recon with limited on call combat capability.
I suppose this could be a solution as well. But I think that a 1 man cap would work too. That way they could remain a strategically viable asset, but without the possibility to completely cripple a gren squad in a matter of seconds.
Posts: 606
Not to 1 each. Like 2 of each thing^^
Sounds great buddy. Go make a balance thread about that and we'll discuss it there
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
I think going for 2 snipers in this patch is actually a very bad idea with all the potent light vehicles and camo units in the game currently.
I think a lot of players get overly focused on the snipers and a desire to kill them outright.
I hate to say this and its very map dependent of course, but, i think this problem can be solved with some changes in play.
Posts: 606
Going for multiple snipers is annoying to face, but its 720mp into two small fragile units with limited versatility.
I think going for 2 snipers in this patch is actually a very bad idea with all the potent light vehicles and camo units in the game currently.
I think a lot of players get overly focused on the snipers and a desire to kill them outright.
I hate to say this and its very map dependent of course, but, i think this problem can be solved with some changes in play.
You are no doubt completely right that this is a L2P issue and that it can be countered and beaten (and I often do).
However, my point is that much like old (and to some extend still existing) Sim City strategy could be countered, playing against it is a drag, requires somewhat low effort to pull off and generally reduce the enjoyment of playing the game.
I'm all for diverse opening and strategies and don't want to tie people down into a bottleneck strategies, but I honestly don't feel like the game would lose some truly enjoyable plays if more was done to weed out these "troll strategies".
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Posts: 606
Core teching is something, that was designed for faction to be used in unlimited numbers. I agree about limits for doctrine units, but basic stuff (snipers too) should be limited only by popcap.
I agree that it's not something that should be overdone, but technically non doctrinal limit allready applies to another unit - The KT.
And yes, I know that's an entirely different ball park, but I do feel like some things reward lazy play that let's you punch above your weight without much effort.
But overall I see the point that this argument could be made in many instances.
Livestreams
10 | |||||
49 | |||||
48 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.830222.789+36
- 2.561204.733+3
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.916404.694-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.721440.621+3
- 8.14758.717+1
- 9.17046.787-1
- 10.1019662.606+4
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Ellmjnhiem
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM