They fall far too fast!
You don't have anytime at all to move your AT guns before the bombs hit and wipe them
Wer Fragmentation bombs
13 Dec 2018, 18:33 PM
#1
Posts: 773
13 Dec 2018, 18:44 PM
#2
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
They fall far too fast!
You don't have anytime at all to move your AT guns before the bombs hit and wipe them
Now test the IL-2 bombing run.
13 Dec 2018, 19:27 PM
#3
Posts: 773
Then add that to the list of things that are broken
13 Dec 2018, 20:53 PM
#4
Posts: 450
Fragmentation bombs land about second faster. 
The problem usually revolves around each bombing run being dropped closer to the edges of the map
The problem usually revolves around each bombing run being dropped closer to the edges of the map
13 Dec 2018, 20:56 PM
#5
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Fragmentation bombs land about second faster.
The problem usually revolves around each bombing run being dropped closer to the edges of the map
Which IL-2 run? The AT strafe on tank hunter is much more similar to frag bombs, and I *believe* their arrival time is the same.
13 Dec 2018, 21:04 PM
#6
Posts: 450
Bombs land faster using fragmentation against il-2.
13 Dec 2018, 21:35 PM
#7
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
you can have fragmentation bombs, no problem.
can i have hawker typhoons then?
can i have hawker typhoons then?
13 Dec 2018, 22:09 PM
#8
Posts: 3053
you can have fragmentation bombs, no problem.
can i have hawker typhoons then?
Lol you’d take typhoons over AT Stuka loiter?
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
13 Dec 2018, 22:50 PM
#9
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
you can have fragmentation bombs, no problem.
can i have hawker typhoons then?
You'll probably get a 3 for 2 bargain in exchange for AT Stuka loiter.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Dec 2018, 00:24 AM
#10
Posts: 223
180 muni for a chance of wiping a squad isn't cheap. I use it primarily to punish blobbing team weapons or Rifles.
Even then if you want to really wipe squads the Gren rifle nade still exists and require no commander.
Even then if you want to really wipe squads the Gren rifle nade still exists and require no commander.
Fail of War 3
14 Dec 2018, 00:35 AM
#11
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Vet 3 rangers with thompsons > Anything else.
14 Dec 2018, 01:59 AM
#12
Posts: 5279
Vet 3 rangers with thompsons > Anything else.
Found out why on the official forums: on top of the Thompsons great profile rangers actually have a damage reduction modifier so even a direct grenade won't drop a model. Knock %10 off ever bullet too and you have a very strong squad...
#stalinwept
14 Dec 2018, 05:22 AM
#13
Posts: 1979
180 muni for a chance of wiping a squad isn't cheap. I use it primarily to punish blobbing team weapons or Rifles.
Even then if you want to really wipe squads the Gren rifle nade still exists and require no commander.
200 muni IL-2 runs should wipe squads aswell... but its alot slower in comparison and only really useful vs static or slow targets
14 Dec 2018, 07:47 AM
#14
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
You'll probably get a 3 for 2 bargain in exchange for AT Stuka loiter.
then i take the croc, land mattress and hawkers for fragmentaion bombs and stuka loiter
14 Dec 2018, 08:12 AM
#15
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
then i take the croc, land mattress and hawkers for fragmentaion bombs and stuka loiter
Then why don't you simply play UKF?
14 Dec 2018, 09:42 AM
#16
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Found out why on the official forums: on top of the Thompsons great profile rangers actually have a damage reduction modifier so even a direct grenade won't drop a model. Knock %10 off ever bullet too and you have a very strong squad...
Yeah, now that 400mp cost actually makes sense in contrast to thompson paras and shocks.
then i take the croc, land mattress and hawkers for fragmentaion bombs and stuka loiter
You'll get 3 typhoons for 2 stukas
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Dec 2018, 10:44 AM
#17
Posts: 144
200 muni IL-2 runs should wipe squads aswell... but its alot slower in comparison and only really useful vs static or slow targets
And tanks. There is a fair chance to remove a slightly damaged heavy with an Il-2 strike. Fragmentation bombing is only effective vs. soft targets, and those are far more manouverable and suffer less from pathfinding issues than tanks.
14 Dec 2018, 18:51 PM
#18
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Then why don't you simply play UKF?
i do, a lot
it's funny building 0MP trenches with vet vickers, camo commandos gammon bomb on Points, and of cpourse, land mattressing around
14 Dec 2018, 18:59 PM
#19
Posts: 149
i do, a lot
it's funny building 0MP trenches with vet vickers, camo commandos gammon bomb on Points, and of cpourse, land mattressing around
I thought trenches cost mp.
14 Dec 2018, 19:24 PM
#20
Posts: 5279
I thought trenches cost mp.
They did when you could build them in enemy territory but an already capable starting unit that can build garrisons in enemy territory from the word go is bad design
#stalinwept
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
681 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.1109614.644+10
- 4.607220.734+1
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
817 users are online:
817 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49110
Welcome our newest member, jhonnycena0400
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, jhonnycena0400
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM