Thanks for the link to Cruzz's file. I eventually found the increase in SU-85 penetration in the patch notes but it's tedious searching for everything that way.
You are welcomed, happy I could help.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Thanks for the link to Cruzz's file. I eventually found the increase in SU-85 penetration in the patch notes but it's tedious searching for everything that way.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I will not even going read personal remarks any more but let me try to explain to you the affects of vet armor bonus and HP bonus for Brumbar and Dozer vs dedicated TDs.
A vet 0 Stug firing on vet 0 Dozer needs 5 penetrating shots and at least 4 reload to kill it.
The chance of getting 5 penetrating shots in a row is 44%.
The vet 2 stug firing on vet 2 Dozer now needs 6 penetrating and at lest 5 reload to kill it.
The chance of getting 6 penetrating shots in a row is 38%.
A vet 0 Su-85 firing on vet 0 Brumbar need 5 penetrating shots and at least 4 reload to kill it.
The chance of getting 5 penetrating shots in a row is 66%.
The vet 2 Su-85 firing on vet 2 Brumabr still need 5 penetrating and at lest 4 reload to kill it.
The chance of getting 5 penetrating shots in a row vs the higher armor with the higher penetration it gets, is now 100%.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Can you now do the same, but instead of StuG using Panther now, so we have actual top tier TD potential compared to top tier TD potential instead of biased T3 vs T4 units comparison?
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Thanks for the link to Cruzz's file. I eventually found the increase in SU-85 penetration in the patch notes but it's tedious searching for everything that way.
Posts: 3053
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
My advice stop being lazy and do it yourself, but what the heck.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Nothing to do with lazyness, just me trying to get rid your THE worst habit, comparing apples to oranges to prove your artificial truths when you're wrong.
And thank you for doing so.
You wouldn't compare T-70 to P4 and try to justify T-70 being too weak in AT against mediums and its equally pointless to do that level of comparison with TDs, comparing SU-86/jackson/FF to anything below panther.
Posts: 1954
58 | |||||
24 | |||||
8 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 | |||||
221 | |||||
51 | |||||
30 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |