Login

russian armor

Feedback for Commander Revamppatch

PAGES (107)down
19 Sep 2018, 09:12 AM
#961
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

I also wanted to add a few new suggestions for the Ost commanders, seeing as the Forward HQs are being combined with field buildings, I suggest the German FHQ be combined with some bunker upgrades, a 4th upgrade for repair pioneers and an upgrade for the command bunker to allow for the forward retreat.

Another thing for the Defensive commander is the replacement of the StuG E with a command Panzer IV since it fits more with the commander's more defensive theme.

As for the Infantry doctrine, give the Arty officer a forward retreat like the Soviet commissar and perhaps either the StuG E or Short barreled Panzer IV could replace the problematic Stormtroopers or Sprint, both tanks were used in the infantry support role.
19 Sep 2018, 09:36 AM
#962
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 08:33 AMStark
Few cents to a German Infantry Commander

1. PanzerShrek upgrade for Stormtroopers with their close combat, stealth style doesn't really works for them. 1 shrek isn't a serious thread to anything and really decrease your AI capabilities to 25%.
Can we consider adding a "AT package" which also with shrek would include posibility to lay shu mines or teller mines and decrease price (of an upgrade) even more to 60 ammo. I mean currently it's not really worth getting option - should be more atractive. Not suggesting any form of AT granade becouse with cammo that could be too deadly.


Perhaps add an option for the Stormtroopers to 'put away' their Panzershreck like Sturmpioneers can put away the minesweeper? This would further make Stormtroopers more attractive compared to Panzergrenadiers because they wouldn't have to sacrifice their situational AI to get some light AT.
19 Sep 2018, 10:10 AM
#963
avatar of Smartie

Posts: 857 | Subs: 2



Perhaps add an option for the Stormtroopers to 'put away' their Panzershreck like Sturmpioneers can put away the minesweeper? This would further make Stormtroopers more attractive compared to Panzergrenadiers because they wouldn't have to sacrifice their situational AI to get some light AT.


+1 good idea!
19 Sep 2018, 13:01 PM
#964
avatar of jagd wölfe

Posts: 1660

No chance that relic can put Command Panther behind tier 4 and Ostwind back as call in ?

I can't get why a vehicle that provides no AT in a commander with no techless AT can't be left as call in, and why it was even locked beyond its actual tier.
Meanwhile command panther is a call in crutch.
19 Sep 2018, 13:17 PM
#965
avatar of Smartie

Posts: 857 | Subs: 2

No chance that relic can put Command Panther behind tier 4 and Ostwind back as call in ?

I can't get why a vehicle that provides no AT in a commander with no techless AT can't be left as call in, and why it was even locked beyond its actual tier.
Meanwhile command panther is a call in crutch.


I agree that the Ostwind should be a call-in. It was already behind CP 8 - same as KV-1 - and came out VERY late for a pure AI unit. You barely see players pick scavange doc now, would change if Ostwind would be call-in again. (Especially after Jaeger buff)
19 Sep 2018, 14:11 PM
#966
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3

I am all for the KV-2 buffs, but Urban Defense doctrine definitely should NOT get this unit IMO.

I use this doctrine a lot, and I still think KV2 isn't really fair here. The way how this doc works in the live version is that you use the FHQs to throw yourself at the opponent so you block his way to VPs or important resource points, means you aim for a very fast win on VPs (or cuz you or your teammates out-teched the enemy completely). So by the time the enemy destroyed the FHQs, he has to face mines, booby traps, superior teching and teammates who dug in, making it extremely hard to come back for him; all that at the cost of a poor lategame and extremely delayed teching.


But now with KV-2 you have a strong late game as well... I can see people just spamming one FHQ after the other until they call-in a KV-2 without even teching to t3 or t4.

And also... now where the incendiary barrage got removed and booby trap cost got changed to 50, this will just be another doctrine where you float tons of munitions cuz u cant spend it on anything. I suggest reverting the "swap incendiary barrage with KV2" change.
19 Sep 2018, 14:36 PM
#967
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

I am all for the KV-2 buffs, but Urban Defense doctrine definitely should NOT get this unit IMO.

I use this doctrine a lot, and I still think KV2 isn't really fair here. The way how this doc works in the live version is that you use the FHQs to throw yourself at the opponent so you block his way to VPs or important resource points, means you aim for a very fast win on VPs (or cuz you or your teammates out-teched the enemy completely). So by the time the enemy destroyed the FHQs, he has to face mines, booby traps, superior teching and teammates who dug in, making it extremely hard to come back for him; all that at the cost of a poor lategame and extremely delayed teching.


But now with KV-2 you have a strong late game as well... I can see people just spamming one FHQ after the other until they call-in a KV-2 without even teching to t3 or t4.

And also... now where the incendiary barrage got removed and booby trap cost got changed to 50, this will just be another doctrine where you float tons of munitions cuz u cant spend it on anything. I suggest reverting the "swap incendiary barrage with KV2" change.


About the muni argument i am kind of on your side.
But hey: You know can pick this doc even when there are no house on a map :P
19 Sep 2018, 14:42 PM
#968
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

No chance that relic can put Command Panther behind tier 4 and Ostwind back as call in ?

I can't get why a vehicle that provides no AT in a commander with no techless AT can't be left as call in, and why it was even locked beyond its actual tier.
Meanwhile command panther is a call in crutch.


Call-in Ostwind was as much as cancer as M10 was. You can't really be serious.
19 Sep 2018, 14:47 PM
#969
avatar of jagd wölfe

Posts: 1660

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 14:42 PMEsxile


Call-in Ostwind was as much as cancer as M10 was. You can't really be serious.


How so ? It was 8 CP, it cane at the exact same moment the wehr tier 3 was avaiable and could do jackshit against vehicles.
M10 countered vehicles and crushed infantry.

Completely different stuff.
19 Sep 2018, 14:52 PM
#970
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1



How so ? It was 8 CP, it cane at the exact same moment the wehr tier 3 was avaiable and could do jackshit against vehicles.
M10 countered vehicles and crushed infantry.

Completely different stuff.


OKW has a much stronger early game and T0 ATGs, the Ostwind was the lazy call-in to keep on the pressure, from shock unit to shock unit and could often be used in groups to keep the enemy base pinned.
The M10 was often used to survive Ostwinds, because they would arrive before you could stabilize and tech up, one of them leaving means the other one should also go. You can't have Call-In Prostwinds while USF has M10s tied to tech.
19 Sep 2018, 15:04 PM
#971
avatar of Stark

Posts: 626 | Subs: 1

I am all for the KV-2 buffs, but Urban Defense doctrine definitely should NOT get this unit IMO.

I use this doctrine a lot, and I still think KV2 isn't really fair here. The way how this doc works in the live version is that you use the FHQs to throw yourself at the opponent so you block his way to VPs or important resource points, means you aim for a very fast win on VPs (or cuz you or your teammates out-teched the enemy completely). So by the time the enemy destroyed the FHQs, he has to face mines, booby traps, superior teching and teammates who dug in, making it extremely hard to come back for him; all that at the cost of a poor lategame and extremely delayed teching.


But now with KV-2 you have a strong late game as well... I can see people just spamming one FHQ after the other until they call-in a KV-2 without even teching to t3 or t4.

And also... now where the incendiary barrage got removed and booby trap cost got changed to 50, this will just be another doctrine where you float tons of munitions cuz u cant spend it on anything. I suggest reverting the "swap incendiary barrage with KV2" change.


+1 totally agree
19 Sep 2018, 15:07 PM
#972
avatar of jagd wölfe

Posts: 1660



OKW has a much stronger early game and T0 ATGs, the Ostwind was the lazy call-in to keep on the pressure, from shock unit to shock unit and could often be used in groups to keep the enemy base pinned.
The M10 was often used to survive Ostwinds, because they would arrive before you could stabilize and tech up, one of them leaving means the other one should also go. You can't have Call-In Prostwinds while USF has M10s tied to tech.


CP 8 made it come way after luchs and ostwind had nowhere the shockvalue of actual rushed luchs, so your point about USF not being able to handle it is null.

M10 made Major tech obsolete and unneeded even at late game.
19 Sep 2018, 15:39 PM
#973
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243

ostwind is totally weak compared the other AI based tanks.

19 Sep 2018, 17:57 PM
#974
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

Okay, who thought of giving Ostheer 960 HP 35 armor repair staion for 250 MP and X munitions?
These things would be undestructible by howitzers and rocket artillery.
There would be zero counterplay to this and more importantly - bunkers are already purest of form of cancer in teamgames, they cost zero popcap unlike Brit emplacements and could be easily spammed in lategame
What did you even think when coming up with that idea?
Did you even bother check stats on Soviet repair station? Like check it's hp/armor and cost compared to these bunkers?
19 Sep 2018, 17:59 PM
#975
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1

ostwind is totally weak compared the other AI based tanks.



Germans don't need to have the best of everything.
19 Sep 2018, 18:00 PM
#976
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 17:57 PMKirrik
Okay, who thought of giving Ostheer 960 HP 35 armor repair staion for 250 MP and X munitions?
These things would undestructible by howitzers and rocket artillery.
There would be zero counterplay to this and more importantly - bunkers are already purest of form of cancer in teamgames, they cost zero popcap unlike Brit emplacements and could be easily spammed in lategame
What did even think when coming up with that idea?
Did you even bother check stats on Soviet repair station? Like check it's hp/armor and cost compared to these bunkers?


Curb your passive aggressiveness, stats can be and probably will be adjusted, plus nothing here is set in stone, they could as easily just make it an upgrade for the regular bunker depending on it's performance.
19 Sep 2018, 18:01 PM
#977
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

Looking forward to testing the new 221/223. I'm a bit concerned about its timing but otherwise shaping up to be a great unit and a welcome edition to OKW. Changes to OST commanders look great, too!
19 Sep 2018, 18:01 PM
#978
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573



Curb your passive aggressiveness, stats can be and probably will be adjusted, plus nothing here is set in stone, they could as easily just make it an upgrade for the regular bunker depending on it's performance.


Upgrade for a bunker that cost 25mp more than actual repair stations and has 640hp? Nice one
19 Sep 2018, 18:08 PM
#979
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 18:01 PMKirrik


Upgrade for a bunker that cost 25mp more than actual repair stations and has 640hp? Nice one


"As(s)ymmetrical balance" as people answer most of my logical suggestions.
19 Sep 2018, 18:20 PM
#980
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1

Concrete Bunkers will put a stop to anything early game on those MOBA style maps with lanes, sure to ruin a lot of games, completely denying infantry play in maps you can't flank it. Even if you flank it has the health of a Panther, will a Paratrooper Demo even kill it in one use?
PAGES (107)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: Hopefully we can look back and laugh in a couple years. But the Steam reviews are diving again so... :guyokay:
Today, 08:03 AM
Rosbone: @donofsandiego The counts are up a little. Coh3 actually passes Coh2 for a short period now. So Coh3 is no longer shit. It has a way to go to be "good". But it is healing. :gimpy:
Today, 08:01 AM
donofsandiego: :foreveralone::gimpy::mcsteve:
Today, 06:28 AM
donofsandiego: Last time I was on here my good friend Rosbone told me that CoH 3 is shit because it doesn't have visible kill counts. Well, it has them now. Where are the players?
Today, 06:27 AM
Rosbone: @Soheil Relic is in a hard spot. They need players for Coh3 so it hurts their Coh3 sales to make Coh2 even better than it already is. So we are all lost waiting for Coh3 to get finished to our liking.
Today, 02:50 AM
Rosbone: @Sinsa-Koso You can request it. But it will never be deleted :romeoHairDay:
Today, 02:48 AM
Sinsa-Koso: Hello! Can I request my account be deleted?
Today, 02:28 AM
Soheil: Coh3 neither has realistic graphic nor diversity anyway , The big issue im coh2 is cheaters . Developers do not care about these map hackers or sync hackers who most of them are chinese
Yesterday, 21:56 PM
Rosbone: @DIRTY_FINISHER My guess is none of those people play coh3 and are mostly gone from the community :snfPeter:
Yesterday, 07:17 AM
DIRTY_FINISHER: Whens the “player council” going to accept some responsibility for the failure that is COH3. Considering they had influence on development and impact to in game units/mechanics :)
Last Tuesday, 15:46 PM
oakdk: Anybody know what has happende to coh3 forums on relic webpage ?
Last Monday, 11:26 AM
Willy Pete: Blasphemy. @aerafield get to work on this fool
Last Monday, 03:58 AM
Reverb: coh3 is not a good game i must say
Last Saturday, 23:34 PM
Reverb: relic should stop coh3 and do hing with coh2 again and make new maps and balance and units and make player base 10000 again
Last Saturday, 23:34 PM
aerafield: Rico will save this forum
Last Friday, 16:52 PM
Rosbone: Player 8 (Rico) has entered the game.
Last Friday, 11:41 AM
Osinyagov: Since it's the only coh-related source left in my list (funny and sad at the same time)
08 Dec 2024, 07:56 AM
Osinyagov: @Gbpirate I am visiting site from time to time, see some content here would be great
08 Dec 2024, 07:55 AM
Rosbone: Fatality!
08 Dec 2024, 03:13 AM
Brick Top: you only need one veto to veto coh3 :thumb:
07 Dec 2024, 22:56 PM

Livestreams

Germany 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

329 users are online: 1 member and 328 guests
Mahomes
4 posts in the last 24h
16 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49900
Welcome our newest member, Mahomes
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM