Login

russian armor

The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.

23 Jun 2018, 05:38 AM
#21
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

Sure. Then buff grens early game. If not, leave mg42 as it is.
23 Jun 2018, 11:13 AM
#22
avatar of Butcher

Posts: 1217

Are we playing the same game?

Maxim cancer is meta. And it's breaking the game. Good luck wiping 6 men weapon crews.
23 Jun 2018, 15:26 PM
#23
avatar of FelixTHM

Posts: 503 | Subs: 1

One of the Axis units is better than the Allied counterparts. Game is broken.

We've all seen this post before - it'll basically never stop coming back.

I'm willing to bet that even when all 5 factions have exactly the same units with exactly the same stats, there'll still be people complaining. We could be playing Soviet mirror matches and this dragonul dude would still find something to whine about.

"My conscripts are underpowered, your conscripts are overperforming, it's obviously imbalanced!"
23 Jun 2018, 16:18 PM
#24
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587

Eh, mg42 probably is too good but that's one of those things that are balanced with early game grens being weak.

Not a fan of that sort of balance.
24 Jun 2018, 01:31 AM
#25
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Jun 2018, 11:13 AMButcher
Are we playing the same game?

Maxim cancer is meta. And it's breaking the game.


I gotta ask you the same question. Are you like 10 patches behind? Get a 222 or a luchs, bye bye maxim spam.
24 Jun 2018, 09:04 AM
#26
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1



I gotta ask you the same question. Are you like 10 patches behind? Get a 222 or a luchs, bye bye maxim spam.


Neither is particularly effective vs Cons and Soviet T2. Zis and Conscript AT nades say hi.
24 Jun 2018, 09:59 AM
#27
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587



Neither is particularly effective vs Cons and Soviet T2. Zis and Conscript AT nades say hi.


Or guards. There is nothing they can't do.
24 Jun 2018, 16:07 PM
#28
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1



Neither is particularly effective vs Cons and Soviet T2. Zis and Conscript AT nades say hi.


Do grens and volks not have snares? If their "spamming" maxims they will not have too many cons. Would love to see a replay of a recent maxim spam used against you
24 Jun 2018, 16:36 PM
#29
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587



Do grens and volks not have snares? If their "spamming" maxims they will not have too many cons. Would love to see a replay of a recent maxim spam used against you


Got one better:


24 Jun 2018, 16:42 PM
#30
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

Maxim need to be looked ot at least give it some
damage
All others r ok
24 Jun 2018, 17:26 PM
#31
avatar of zarok47

Posts: 587

Maxim need to be looked ot at least give it some
damage
All others r ok


No.
24 Jun 2018, 17:32 PM
#32
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jun 2018, 16:36 PMzarok47


Got one better:



Don't even get why you used that many maxims. Feels like you could've won just fine with a few less mgs and a few more cons...
24 Jun 2018, 17:51 PM
#33
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

Maxim is "good" because it's annoying. But it's boring as fuck. The 6 man crew make it durable but the death loop take even that away at times. It's strong but it's not good. Any unit that has to be used in groups is not good.
24 Jun 2018, 17:59 PM
#34
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

Any unit that has to be used in groups is not good.


This

24 Jun 2018, 19:27 PM
#35
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Jun 2018, 00:25 AMLuciano
I wouldnt mess too much with machine guns, they are pretty much balanced compared to other things, probably would look at something else. On the other hand tho, maxim vet 1 ability has little utility in my opinion and should be replaced with something more useful, like armor piercing rounds.

+1

Offtopic a little, but one thing I do think needs looking at is how easily the incendiary rounds kill WASP UCs because the WASP is supposed to counter the 42, not the other way around. Yes you can just run away if the mg doesn't fire for more than a second and a half (since you know he is putting AP rounds) but if youdon't immediately do so the UC is lost since it dies in like 1.3 bursts. It might just be an issue with the WASP though. Maybe extend the range on the WASP a little or give it more health.
25 Jun 2018, 14:06 PM
#36
avatar of FrogKing

Posts: 7

OSt is build around crutch MG42 because of glass-cannon gren. My solution: Switch MG42 to OKW (but reduce supression to MG34 level and change price to MG34-level, but give slight increase too damage), give OST MG34 with old MG42 stats/price except nerf supression but therefore give Gren timed supression ability at Vet1 (like Obers but without limit to 1 targeted squad, Medikits only for Pioneers). This would also have the bonus of faction uniqueness + historical accuracy (Ending ahistorical nuisances like late game German army(OKW) using the older MG34, the MG34 being cheaper than the mass-produced/more economical MG42 )
25 Jun 2018, 15:31 PM
#37
avatar of Array
Donator 11

Posts: 609

OSt is build around crutch MG42 because of glass-cannon gren. My solution: Switch MG42 to OKW (but reduce supression to MG34 level and change price to MG34-level, but give slight increase too damage), give OST MG34 with old MG42 stats/price except nerf supression but therefore give Gren timed supression ability at Vet1 (like Obers but without limit to 1 targeted squad, Medikits only for Pioneers). This would also have the bonus of faction uniqueness + historical accuracy (Ending ahistorical nuisances like late game German army(OKW) using the older MG34, the MG34 being cheaper than the mass-produced/more economical MG42 )



this is very complicated and if grens only got suppression at vet 1soviet and us would probably destroy OST in the first 3 minutes
25 Jun 2018, 16:46 PM
#38
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

Grens are not glass cannon.
25 Jun 2018, 17:32 PM
#39
avatar of Array
Donator 11

Posts: 609

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Jun 2018, 16:46 PMEsxile
Grens are not glass cannon.


Glass pea shooters?
25 Jun 2018, 17:42 PM
#40
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4

OSt is build around crutch MG42 because of glass-cannon gren. My solution: Switch MG42 to OKW (but reduce supression to MG34 level and change price to MG34-level, but give slight increase too damage), give OST MG34 with old MG42 stats/price except nerf supression but therefore give Gren timed supression ability at Vet1 (like Obers but without limit to 1 targeted squad, Medikits only for Pioneers). This would also have the bonus of faction uniqueness + historical accuracy (Ending ahistorical nuisances like late game German army(OKW) using the older MG34, the MG34 being cheaper than the mass-produced/more economical MG42 )


This basically says, make the MG42 an MG34 except with vickers damage. Just so many issues with this. Ostheer doesn't need damage, they need suppression.

And then make the MG34 with MG42 stats but lower the suppression.....

Then, give gren suppression abilities which would reinforce gren spam.......
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

784 users are online: 784 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM