He wasn't including The Starting SP.
And any particular reason for that?
Starting SP doesn't have any abilities locked for being free and its about cost of having 2 squads on field, what's the point of having 3 SPs?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
He wasn't including The Starting SP.
Posts: 518
And any particular reason for that?
Starting SP doesn't have any abilities locked for being free and its about cost of having 2 squads on field, what's the point of having 3 SPs?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The point of having 3 SPs? One for AT purpose,one for clearing mines and one for building bases( one guy adviced that OKW also should need SP for building bases)
Posts: 33
The point of having 3 SPs? One for AT purpose,one for clearing mines and one for building bases( one guy adviced that OKW also should need SP for building bases)
Posts: 518
I honestly can't tell if you're joking or not.
I'll assume you do.
Posts: 518
What a laughable Thread. If you are rushing your opponents base and destroying his buildings without him having any sort of AT, then you already won the game anyway. This "Issue" of base buildings being destructable is absolutely irrelevant.
Funny enough, UKF is probably the most vulnerable when it comes to base rushes, simply due to them not having AT snares on their main infantry, so really OP is crying about axis getting rushed while UKF is the faction having the hardest time dealing with it.
Go ahead and do that, you will soon enough realize that while having 3 SP's is "nice", you will fall behind and start losing more games. Also you'll have to explain what you mean with "building bases", if you want to play Sim city then you should just switch over to UKF tbh.
Posts: 5279
Posts: 3260
I am not sure if you just didn't care or really did not read any other post of this thread.
I am NOT talking about bases which are 100% destroyed but about destroying one Base building (or 2) and then falling back again.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So you never use Sweeper or Schreck ?
Posts: 33
I am NOT talking about bases which are 100% destroyed but about destroying one Base building (or 2) and then falling back again.
And to the 3 SP.I already said what I mean with "Base building" : One player was talking about giving the task of building bases to OKWs SP instead of letting them set up truck
Posts: 518
The point he was making is that doesn't happen. If you're in a position to destroy the enemy base buildings without losing your tanks then you destroy them all. If you're not, throwing away tanks by attacking the enemy base will probably lose you the game.
Posts: 518
Didnt realize it derailed so much that we're dealing with highly improbable hypothetical scenarios here.
If you are going for his base buildings instead of his actual units, then you are just doing him a favor and make a comeback more likely to happen.
Posts: 3260
I did this a few times in 2 vs 2.While the enemy was attacking our VPs I was rushing with 2-3 Pz 4s to his base,destroyed his T4 and then fell back again as soon as the T 34s came to defend it(talking about rank 900-1200(maybe won't work against better players) and btw. If giving the UKF/USF destroyable bases would change no thing then why just don't give OST and SU nondestroyable ones too (for OKW there might be a solution too)?
Posts: 518
In theory I'd have no issue with that. The UKF base is the best designed one in the game in my opinion. Having to have an engineer build OST and SOV's base structures adds nothing which is probably why they ditched it for the newer factions. That's the answer to your initial question by the way.
This is entirely academic, however. I'm fairly sure the assets don't exist for rebuildable OST and SOV bases (except the HQ which already works like a USF/UKF one) and even if they did it's not enough of an issue for Relic to put in all the work to change it.
OKW's a bit different because its structures are functional emplacements that have a field presence.
Posts: 3260
Posts: 728
Posts: 518
Pointless thread other than to prove the point of my quote you then made your sig. I kinda like it.
Posts: 3260
Well thers nothing to prove ... it is obvious that Europeans just think that they a superior to every other nation and thus wan't to nerf USF so hard that all their units had the same worth as a Osttruppen squad with one member left.Everone who does not see this must either be blind or influenced by the european propaganda.
Posts: 518
wat
Posts: 728
Don't take this post of mine serious.I was just joking about Rocket (he claimed that Europeans want to nerf the USF and buff axis because they think that European nations are better than USA etc.)