Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The thing honestly just likely needs a slight price reduction, adjustment to AOE so it does more damage on the outer edge but less in the center -its OHK radius is still pretty large- and allowing its veterancy to actually come in and be more worthwhile.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I know that the KT needs support, but that doesn't mean that it's scatter has to be so bad. Also I never said that the KT having to fight TDs was an issue, I was just stating a fact. Also the armor of the KT and the penetration of allied TDs wasnt changed recently, so im not sure why you are bringing up allied TDs ability to dent the KTs armor. The main thing that changed is that the Jackson got overbuffed.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 515
Its pretty much slow non doctrinal IS-2 with more HP, more range and 50% higher damage.
Its fine as it is.
Posts: 207
Was it up to me, all tanks would have terrible scatter and most of their AI would come from MGs.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
The thing honestly just likely needs a slight price reduction, adjustment to AOE so it does more damage on the outer edge but less in the center -its OHK radius is still pretty large- and allowing its veterancy to actually come in and be more worthwhile.
Posts: 526
Was it up to me, all tanks would have terrible scatter and most of their AI would come from MGs.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 5279
This would be fine if you also nerfed infantry AT and stickies.
Posts: 1930
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned Posts: 5279
I feel like the King tiger's enormous damage and dps make it harder to balance.
historically the kwk43 used the same/similar projectile as the kwk 36 but loaded with more propellant. of course, damage and hp is kind of arbitrarily to begin with.
the IS-2 should really have been the one with 200-240 damage, as its 122m was a huge caliber gun for the period. On the other hand, it was also infamously slow to reload due to the same fact.
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1
The thing honestly just likely needs a slight price reduction, adjustment to AOE so it does more damage on the outer edge but less in the center -its OHK radius is still pretty large- and allowing its veterancy to actually come in and be more worthwhile.
Posts: 3260
It's simple, just divide the competitive scene's balance from that of the casual and bigger team games balance.
That way shit that's fine in 1v1s won't be OP or UP in team games for example.
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
That would actually be a pretty goid idea, it would lead to a lot less cheesy squad wipes. I think you would have to maybe make a few exceptions for the Soviet heavies, because the KV 2 and ISU 152 both have one machine gun each and very slow firing guns.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I think it will break the balance due the huge amount of yellow cover lategame which, i think, reduces the dps of MG for about 50%. This would be hard to balance.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
That's hardly simple to implement. It might even be impossible with the tools we have.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I agree with you, however Relic probably can do it, too bad they're too lazy as it seems tho.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 607
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I agree with you, however Relic probably can do it, too bad they're too lazy as it seems tho.
Posts: 1930
The thing honestly just likely needs a slight price reduction, adjustment to AOE so it does more damage on the outer edge but less in the center -its OHK radius is still pretty large- and allowing its veterancy to actually come in and be more worthwhile.
 |
|
|
108 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
158 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
