Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
I don't see you being able to realize your balance claims son, you're just talking out of your user experience but probably have absolutely no fucking idea how to do something within the game engine, while I can.
But it's alright, continue to talk out of your (ass) experience based on assumptions, it's what got us to this point and I'm not seeing it change any time soon.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
what are you talking?
you are in a balance forum of a game you haven't played since 2015.
Posts: 1097
Posts: 5279
It's risk vs reward.
However, the OP seems to have an aversion to risk....if only there was a safe sector where buildings can remain unmolested for the early game and away from harm.
Posts: 19
It would have to be immune to offmaps, maybe even defended by MGs or maybe flak bases so enemy infantry cant just stroll in . but alas no such place exists
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Actually being able to move the trucks would encourage risky dynamic play. If you knew you could move it later you would risk an early forward position or late game if you wanted to move them out of the base and into a riskier position you could also do that. Default setup in your base is boring. The low health makes them a late game liability so most people set them up in the base. Then what's the point. Might as well be regular base structures. Anyway sounds like the developers have moved on so not much point in debating further.
Posts: 7
Posts: 135
Permanently Banned
.
 |
|
|
162 | ||
|
|
|
|
44 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
81 | ||
 |
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
