Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Hmm, you've been doing this for the last couple of topics now, what is your motivation exactly? Do you have a fetish for me because I proved you wrong or just like stalking me from your mom's basement or something?
Let's settle this like men, or whatever you identify as.
Posts: 309 | Subs: 1
It sure costs less, but the pit gets countered by double indirect fire and the game is also over if you lose all of a simcity. At least as okw you can get a command panther if you pick that commander (which I usually do for flares if I'm using double isg). Medhq and flakhq are also part of teching, so you would have to include platoon cp and bofors sidetech. Still, emplacements are lulzy and awful, but I guess they're cheaper as you say..
Posts: 307
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Maybe you should Start play the game.dont be a katitof.
There is nothing more cringey than Balance Posters who dont play the game
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
1 
Posts: 2885
This game will never be balanced, COH1 was not balanced COH2 is not balanced COH3 will not be balanced. Just try to accept it and deal with it if you can. This is a small game by a mediocre studio who are still making money from the success of COH1. It's funny that free to play games are more balanced than COH lol.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Question is not if the game is ballanced or why is it not perfectly ballanced. Question is still why non-tournament players care about something that doesn't make any difference. I would understand if somebody cared about the amount of viable strategies or the depth of factions - so that the game is interesting to play. But ballance between factions? Really? We all know it makes no difference whatsoever as the matchmaker either accounts for it (with lots of players in queue) or just gives you a random person that is so far from you on the ladder that ballance is of last importance in the matchup.
1 Posts: 2885
Because people don´t want to lose because of bad balance but because they got outplayed.
Plus playing against Brit cancer kills any fun. It makes you literally want to deinstall the game.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
But it is not a ballance problem. And yes if you lose then you got outplayed - becouse either opponent was much better and ballance didn't matter at all or he was on your level with ballance taken into consideration and played better.
1 Posts: 2885
So if two players play at the same level but one loses because of balance it is somehow still not a balance problem?
4 
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2243
Posts: 728
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Since OKW managed to sneakily enter the scope and get punished by unwarranted nerfs and changes, how about we give the Brits the same treatment? Especially because people complain more about UKF and they are the most abusive faction at the moment?
These are the core problems: Broken Offmaps, ridiculous nades, silly suvivability valuse and bonuses, double LMGs, double piats, ultra fast teching, powerful-multirole-non doctrinal vehicles, and, you guessed it, emplacements.
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
There is no scope. Mr. Smith and miragefla are making a personal mod. They're getting a whole lot of attention since they made the balance patches, but this is just a mod of their own making, independent of anything Relic will do.
/snip
Wait double piats and british grenades are op?
Well to be fair, some of Brit off maps like Bombing Run(90% health trucks in one go), Typhoon Loiter(targets inf and tanks with ridiculous damage)
But what I will say is that Double ISG protected by Med HQ and Flak HQ costs 1260MP/165 Fuel and requires T4, if you lose all of it you essentially lose the game.
Remind my how much a mortar pit and bofors combo costs, then remind me what happens when you lose them?
Posts: 3053
Yes they are. Ever since they made piat a heat seeking missile.
+1
Re: nades, only gammon is OP as fuck.
If 1v1 then yes its GG, if 4v4 then mortar bofors are cancer
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 212
Why is the piat OP for being heat seeking? The bazooka and schreck both do it too. Realistic? No. OP? Not really. They also basically changed the piats stats to the bazooka and increased the cost to 50. It's basically a bazooka with a different skin.
Posts: 3053
He's obviously exaggerating. Sturm Pio with Shrek have gawd awful accuracy and a slow arse fire rate with out vet, but it doesn't feel that way with Piat Engies who seem to never miss.
One has to be super careful with light/med vehicles as Germans these days because of sticky nuclear tipped satchel and laser guided Piats.
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 212
Oh please. Satchels are easy to dodge with anything faster than a kt and piats are just regular old at weapons, nothing more or less than zooks. Schrecks are slow but in exchange you get to penetrate almost everything almost all the time. Not so with piats or zooks.
Posts: 84
Yes you are right about Shreks, but the only OKW unit with access to them has terrible accuracy with out hard to get vet. It is not a Shrek problem but a unit problem. Ost has double shrek with what feels like better accuracy, but double the weapon means double the chance to hit anyway.
 |
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
