Login

russian armor

Is there any logical explanation to 5 pop cap of Major?

6 May 2017, 13:51 PM
#1
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

Is there any logical explanation to 5 pop cap of Major?
Why USF should pay 4 for ambulance and 5 for major?

9 pop cap can be use better
6 May 2017, 13:54 PM
#2
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

If you have pop cap problem with USF remove crew for vehicles..
6 May 2017, 14:19 PM
#3
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

There's a ton of over-pop-costed units for USF. You're supposed to make up for that with USF popcap abuse.

Once we're allowed to fix USF popcap abuse, we can also strip down both Major/Ambulance and remove popcap values from both units.
6 May 2017, 14:21 PM
#4
avatar of Nano

Posts: 212

I dont understand. Why should the major cost 0 popcap? It is still a unit that moves around, call in stuff and can cap points? Lots of good stuff.
6 May 2017, 14:23 PM
#5
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

Meanwhile Pfusies still 6.
6 May 2017, 16:29 PM
#6
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

jump backJump back to quoted post6 May 2017, 14:21 PMNano
I dont understand. Why should the major cost 0 popcap? It is still a unit that moves around, call in stuff and can cap points? Lots of good stuff.


Yeah I rather not have the LT, CPT or Major and just field other units. These units are a manpower sink in the late game and even when you don't reinforce them, they still drain mp income. Silly design if you ask me.

Even if I don't want them, they still show up and drain my mp FeelsBadMan :foreveralone:
6 May 2017, 21:10 PM
#7
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053



Yeah I rather not have the LT, CPT or Major and just field other units. These units are a manpower sink in the late game and even when you don't reinforce them, they still drain mp income. Silly design if you ask me.

Even if I don't want them, they still show up and drain my mp FeelsBadMan :foreveralone:

Sometimes I really wish I could use that space for other units late game, like paras or rangers or team weapons. Capiqua made an interesting thread suggesting removing the free officers and in exchange, teching is cheaper or faster or something in order to get access to other options faster. All other factions really have access to a wider variety of units very early, so I would say that it's worth discussing.
6 May 2017, 21:33 PM
#8
avatar of DAZ187

Posts: 466

Meanwhile Pfusies still 6.


+1
6 May 2017, 21:36 PM
#9
avatar of PanzerGeneralForever

Posts: 1072

I still think each of these units should have a pop cap just a little bit lower. Major still has utility, can cap call down arty etc, and ambulance can be used as Half-track for reinforcing and healing on the front so it also needs a popcap. I'd reduce but not eliminate their popcap
6 May 2017, 21:41 PM
#10
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

Personally I'm in favor of removing crew/decrew ability for the USF. I would rather buff echelon repair speeds such as that of the OKW.

It will reward for wiping rear echelons
It will reward for preserving rear echelons
It will stop popcap abuse

6 May 2017, 22:28 PM
#11
avatar of ClassyDavid

Posts: 424 | Subs: 2

Major should have pop cap due to his excellent utility abilities but he is due for a reduction.
6 May 2017, 23:33 PM
#12
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

I don't get why you people don't like having these units on the field. Major is an obvious one since it gives FRP. With vet it can also be used to block cutoff capture. The other 2 are also amazing late game thanks to the passive sprint. You don't get that ability on any non-officer usf squad.
7 May 2017, 00:07 AM
#13
avatar of wouren
Senior Social Media Manager Badge

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3

Personally I'm in favor of removing crew/decrew ability for the USF. I would rather buff echelon repair speeds such as that of the OKW.

It will reward for wiping rear echelons
It will reward for preserving rear echelons
It will stop popcap abuse


vehicle decrewing is an integral component to how USF works, and popcap exploits are fixable
7 May 2017, 00:49 AM
#14
avatar of ClassyDavid

Posts: 424 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post7 May 2017, 00:07 AMwouren

vehicle decrewing is an integral component to how USF works, and popcap exploits are fixable


To add on that Vehicle crews make USF the unique way it is and where would the critical repair go? RE could have a slight to moderate repair nerf.
7 May 2017, 02:10 AM
#15
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

I don't get why you people don't like having these units on the field. Major is an obvious one since it gives FRP. With vet it can also be used to block cutoff capture. The other 2 are also amazing late game thanks to the passive sprint. You don't get that ability on any non-officer usf squad.

Well, major is amazing but the other two basically limit usf to the classic old riflespam everywhere, as they are basically rifle squads but cannot take the place of rifles in a build order without sacrificing the early game advantage usf has, which is basically suicide. Long story short, makes usf that much less flexible. As units, they are very good.
7 May 2017, 02:59 AM
#16
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

jump backJump back to quoted post7 May 2017, 00:07 AMwouren

vehicle decrewing is an integral component to how USF works, and popcap exploits are fixable


It's not like a faction overhaul isn't possible, just because it's the way it is now doesn't make it right or okay or vonurable for change

I think the changes I say are possible and simple, and something can be compensated in return as I said buff rep rate for echelons, give USF vehicles ability to capture points such that as soviets, or have them self repair such as that of soviets where a crew doesn't exit the vehicle. But the vehicle is immobile for the duration etc etc
7 May 2017, 03:57 AM
#17
avatar of wouren
Senior Social Media Manager Badge

Posts: 1281 | Subs: 3



It's not like a faction overhaul isn't possible, just because it's the way it is now doesn't make it right or okay or vonurable for change


It would be another step in the direction of faction homogenization to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
7 May 2017, 08:44 AM
#18
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
I don't get why you people don't like having these units on the field. Major is an obvious one since it gives FRP. With vet it can also be used to block cutoff capture. The other 2 are also amazing late game thanks to the passive sprint. You don't get that ability on any non-officer usf squad.


Can you write in what maps he can block cutoffs at 1v1 ?
7 May 2017, 10:21 AM
#19
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1



It's not like a faction overhaul isn't possible, just because it's the way it is now doesn't make it right or okay or vonurable for change

I think the changes I say are possible and simple, and something can be compensated in return as I said buff rep rate for echelons, give USF vehicles ability to capture points such that as soviets, or have them self repair such as that of soviets where a crew doesn't exit the vehicle. But the vehicle is immobile for the duration etc etc


How works the M20 in your change? How works the critical repair?
7 May 2017, 11:12 AM
#20
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885



Can you write in what maps he can block cutoffs at 1v1 ?


Basically any map that has long cutoff sector or buildings in such sector. For example in minsk pocket you can hide it behind shotblockers and your opponent won't be able to capture one of the cutoffs.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

999 users are online: 1 member and 998 guests
trainadapt
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM