GCS Balance Preview
Posts: 284 | Subs: 1
Later patch might fix units that u mention it.
Be happy !!! At least Relic do something that never happen before !!! (release next mod review after few days and fast bugfix !!!)
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
- New bug :
Soviet AA truck : AA upgrade absent. Iz broken.
Posts: 366
I mean I get it, trade offensive capabilities for defensive.
I think through how about removing pin from the maxim but increase it's damage (and maybe lower suppression a bit gained back with vet).
It's a mad idea but it would be good at supporting conscripts making it more unique than the same as other mgs.
Posts: 485 | Subs: 1
I think Penals should get upgraded to Strelski with possible DP-28 upgrade if they
vet enough.
Penal state has been debated during months and thousands of threads, to finally give them a ptrs upgrade.
Don't even start with some new 'genious' idea on what to do with them.
even if i agree that conscript are underpowered, the current scope doesn't allow to modify them so we should focus only on the units in scope (maxim, cromwell, ...) and do like everything else was perfect.
(which is anyway, because relic did it )
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
Personally, I think Penals should get upgraded to Strelski with possible DP-28 upgrade if they
vet enough. Can't be a vet 3... CONSCRIPT.
Please do not suggest balance changes to Penals. I want to see Strelky instead of Penals too, but it can be made without balance tweaks: https://www.coh2.org/topic/59641/graphical-design-suggestion-about-penals
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
====
They should just be honest and delete all 3 allied factions.
Every game would be Axis victory
Nah just give axis wunderwaffe from minute zero on top of a V2
Posts: 611
Well, I have not tried the new maxim but can I say that it's a bit disappointing that the maxim is coming closer and closer to other mgs and won't be unique anymore?
I mean I get it, trade offensive capabilities for defensive.
I think through how about removing pin from the maxim but increase it's damage (and maybe lower suppression a bit gained back with vet).
It's a mad idea but it would be good at supporting conscripts making it more unique than the same as other mgs.
I tried making a similar point in an earlier post although i was brainstorming and hadn't fully studied the patch notes. Making the maxim similar to other MGs is one of the easiest routes to balance the unit, but each faction is slowly becoming more and more similar which is extremely disappointing.
In my eyes the maxim should be an offensive weapon, thats why it has such quick setup and packup as well as great durability. Increase its damage output and nerf its suppression time and some of its durability.
Vet ability could then increase suppression for a period of time.
All of this is unlikely though given the timeframe, and I am not completely oposed to the changes in the patch but it is not my preferred option.
Posts: 175
No longer possible to construct emplacements in the base sector
IMO mortar emplacements need a nerf for auto-fire as well.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Please do not suggest balance changes to Penals. I want to see Strelky instead of Penals too, but it can be made without balance tweaks: https://www.coh2.org/topic/59641/graphical-design-suggestion-about-penals
... ...
I meant CONSCRIPTS. Sorry.
I meant conscripts to be able to raise themselves out of mere conscript-hood.
As an alternative to Penals. Which oddly just became Soviet's elite infantry.
Posts: 474
Posts: 927
Really why isn't more people talking about ostheer panther? It's expensive, it has slow rate of fire and it has worthless accuracy. For a sniper its bad, for a breakthrough its bad, its pathetic against infantry, its good if you want to drain your resources.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
- the opening of Molotov and antitank grenades combined into one
- remove the delay of Molotov's throw
- PPSh is not doctrinal, it can be made doctrinally 3 SVT-40
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
fix Conscripts:
- the opening of Molotov and antitank grenades combined into one
- remove the delay of Molotov's throw
- PPSh is not doctrinal, it can be made doctrinally 3 SVT-40
For God's sake, pay attention to the shoocks, IS-2 and Tiger
Posts: 1220
Posts: 20
Posts: 49
Posts: 162
Posts: 2066
Imo CP's Mark Target is fantastic now. It gives a great balance between extra damage, accuracy and pen. Great change guys!
I second this, it feels right now. I also feel it comes at the right time too with the 11 CP.
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Why dont AT guns and TD's prioritize vehicles by default and instead of "prioritize vehicles" ability give it the "Hold fire" ability?
That's because forcing prioritise vehicles on AT guns/tanks would make it more difficult for them to wreck emplacements/trucks.
To tanks with turrets I dont see how the "hold fire" ability would be useful but it certainly is useful to TD's such as the su-85, the jagdpanzer, the stug and so on, so you can prevent the tank from rotating by itself and exposing the rear armor or getting in a bad position.
Hold fire is useful even for turreted tanks:
- You can use hold-fire micro to better time your shots, and thus avoid moving penalties
- For chasing a particular wounded tank in a target-rich environment. You don't want the turret to acquire other targets as you go for the dive
Livestreams
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.921405.695+5
- 5.634229.735+8
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.1045675.608+3
- 10.722440.621+4
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Dreufritt
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM