Only problem I see with this, is that Churchills are currently locked behind anvil which gives you the airburst shells which in return can be quite nasty, perhaps too nasty for them to be called in by a heavy tank...
Just brainstorming anyways
![;) ;)](/images/Smileys/wink.gif)
Posts: 2
Posts: 453
It is hard to look good, when you are surrounded by far better tanks.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 50
Problem is that with hammer all you need is Comet, nothing else.
With anvil, you won't live long spamming Churchills. You need to combined them with Firefly.
So here is a question.
Do you prefer 2 Coments or 1 Churchill and 1 Firefly?
Churchill is just damage-sponge which needs something hard-hitting.
Comet does everything on its own.
I belive that small armor buff (so it has quite good chance of bouncing pak40) and AI buff would suit very well.
Right now it's a great tool to help axis' paks and panthers vet quite fast huh...
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Posts: 380
This is possible only in big games. Church plus firefly combo is a huge fuel loss. So people will spam cromwells and at guns without any combined arms, because after a huge nerf for comet, these upgrades will become useleth.
Yes it will, if comet wernt so good, we will be seeing some nice Armour combos such as firefly in combination with Churchill
Posts: 466
- Remove smoke projector movement speed penalty (Churchill is already damn slow)
Posts: 593
Posts: 593
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
Posts: 525
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29
Posts: 985 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Posts: 88
Posts: 50
I think that no matter how strong you make the smoke projector of the churchill, this will never match the effectiveness of a long-range smoke shell from the Cromwell, both in terms of protecting itself, or in terms of protecting juicy targets (firefly), or in terms of covering advancing infantry.
You -are- putting the tank in danger anyway, and there's only one avenue of attack you are creating; right behind the churchill. A clever adversary will just fire at the churchill and suppress all your troops, or will just use indirect fire.
The Cromwell can also flank stuff with ease, which the Churchill can't do. Thus, the churchill makes little chance to build, even if you go Anvil, unless you're playing Pripyat sector or Trois Points.
A better idea would be to have the Churchill provide something complementary to Cromwell's smoke shell. If the Churchill could spawn a smoke cloud that could prevent infantry from being suppressed that would already make it a high-utility tank.
This will make the Churchill a high-value target for the enemy, thus allowing it to fulfill its role as a meatshield (now, it can be safely ignored).
In that way, Hammer will be the specialization about tank support, and Anvil will be about infantry-support.
The question, then, becomes about how to make said smoke buff not synergise too well with LMG blobs.
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
What about losing the Cromwell's smoke shell then?
Posts: 50
That could kind of work.
However this means that Brits get no smoke until the first Churchill/Comet. In that case, it's better to avoid buying infantry upgrades altogether.
Posts: 1740
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
803 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
19 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
9 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |