Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.5 Update
![avatar of BartonPL](/uploads/avatar/233.jpg?updated=1453219642)
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
![avatar of ferwiner](/images/avatars/panzeriv.png?updated=1440837474)
![Donator 1](/images/badges/crowdfunding/donator_1.png)
Posts: 2885
OKW need disposable smoke by default or doktrinal like other armies. You cant pass through blendkorpher and it arrives too late...
Flak HT smoke is second best in the game after sherman smoke though. Also, soviets are much less smoke - equipped faction. They have it only on UP mortar nondoctrinally.
There was a proposed solution before though - giving flame nades and molotovs sitght blocking in small area. I think this one could be good for the game.
![avatar of Dangerous-Cloth](/images/avatars/panther.png?updated=1395697091)
Posts: 2066
![:foreveralone: :foreveralone:](/images/Smileys/foreveralone.gif)
![avatar of Mr.Smith](/uploads/avatar/17585.jpg?updated=1459425421)
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
instead of having 2 mseparate upgrades for molotovs and AT nades, why not merge it into one? wouldnt that be easier?
That would be a very logical thing to do. Unfortunately, we have no way of justifying that such a change would be in-scope.
![avatar of ZombiFrancis](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 2742
Lock demos and at satchels behind an upgrade. That affects penals/guards and is therefore scope.
Although I'd prefer ppsh cons upgrade but we know that's not scope.
![avatar of Dangerous-Cloth](/images/avatars/panther.png?updated=1395697091)
Posts: 2066
![avatar of __deleted__](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
That would be a very logical thing to do. Unfortunately, we have no way of justifying that such a change would be in-scope.
I actually don´t like idea of merging both upgrades in one. Why I have to pay for mollies when I only want AT nades ? Why I have to pay for AT nades when I want to use only penal flamer/penal mollies ?
![avatar of capiqua](/uploads/avatar/4812.jpg?updated=1396335710)
![Senior Mapmaker Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_MAPMAKER.png)
Posts: 985 | Subs: 2
MERGED NOTES (V1.0 to v1.5)
Someone who changes the title to: Relic WBP Merged Notes v1.0 to v1.5
![avatar of TheSleep3r](/uploads/avatar/12572.jpg?updated=1414593508)
Posts: 670
![avatar of BartonPL](/uploads/avatar/233.jpg?updated=1453219642)
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
That would be a very logical thing to do. Unfortunately, we have no way of justifying that such a change would be in-scope.
you need to justify it? okay no problem, molotov sucks and usually its no pooint in researching it and its also worth to netion that US has with one upgrade two abilites (nades and smoke) and Ostheer gets free faust with tech
![avatar of Mr.Smith](/uploads/avatar/17585.jpg?updated=1459425421)
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
you need to justify it? okay no problem, molotov sucks and usually its no pooint in researching it and its also worth to netion that US has with one upgrade two abilites (nades and smoke) and Ostheer gets free faust with tech
The catch, here, is you need to justify this with respect to light vehicles, or guards/penals, or ost infantry scaling. Conscripts are not in-scope
![:( :(](/images/Smileys/sad.gif)
(OST scaling does NOT mean buffing underpowered squads to match that scaling, btw, else you might have seen shocks buffs).
![avatar of Osinyagov](/uploads/avatar/18206.png?updated=1660237242)
![Senior Modmaker Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_MODMAKER.png)
Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1
KV-8 - Get more informative icon.
![](http://fs5.directupload.net/images/170105/cral3zw7.png)
HM-38 - Get new shield symbol, but don't get updated call-in icon for that.
![](https://i.imgur.com/tsrmSkm.png)
![avatar of |GB| The Hooligan486](/uploads/avatar/15583.png?updated=1515162882)
![Senior Referee Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_REFEREE.png)
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
If we go for the PTRS-flavoured Penals (especially the ones you've been seeing for 1.3-1.5), their PTRS will not bet gated behind the AT grenade upgrade. This is because:
- AT Grenade upgrade is rather expensive
- PTRS Penals are already a downgrade for most part, compared to guards; we don't want to make them any worse than that.
However, from v1.6, and for a few versions, we will be trialing a PTRS-free version of Penals.
The reason locking flamers behind molotovs makes sense is so that you can't rush flamer + scout car and murder everything (without very little consequences). We'll see, though.
You are probably right.
Was thinking out loud
![:D :D](/images/Smileys/biggrin.gif)
![avatar of Gluhoman](/uploads/avatar/9498.jpg?updated=1429299208)
Posts: 380
![avatar of __deleted__](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Still waiting for molotov buff, still waiting
Molotovs are actually really good if you use them against charging squads while you´re in cover. Just drop it in front of you cover and wait til they burn or have to fall back.
Also if you don´t charge with squads into no cover to throw them they are really good. For 15 munnition they counter garrisons and also squads in cover if you´re in mid range combat. Soviets also have oraaah. You have to use your conscripts together to help each other and molotovs are only there to counter, what conscripts alone cannot. They were never meant to be strong as other grenades. They were mean to be cheap garrison/green cover counter that is used in conjuction with oraah and other conscripts.
![avatar of Frost](/uploads/avatar/7463.jpg?updated=1574669572)
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Molotovs are actually really good if you use them against charging squads while you´re in cover. Just drop it in front of you cover and wait til they burn or have to fall back.
Also if you don´t charge with squads into no cover to throw them they are really good. For 15 munnition they counter garrisons and also squads in cover if you´re in mid range combat. Soviets also have oraaah. You have to use your conscripts together to help each other and molotovs are only there to counter, what conscripts alone cannot. They were never meant to be strong as other grenades. They were mean to be cheap garrison/green cover counter that is used in conjuction with oraah and other conscripts.
Don't tell them buddy, they still won't believe that Kappa
![avatar of vasa1719](/uploads/avatar/10039.jpg?updated=1408056701)
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
Molotovs are actually really good if you use them against charging squads while you´re in cover. Just drop it in front of you cover and wait til they burn or have to fall back.
Also if you don´t charge with squads into no cover to throw them they are really good. For 15 munnition they counter garrisons and also squads in cover if you´re in mid range combat. Soviets also have oraaah. You have to use your conscripts together to help each other and molotovs are only there to counter, what conscripts alone cannot. They were never meant to be strong as other grenades. They were mean to be cheap garrison/green cover counter that is used in conjuction with oraah and other conscripts.
So why grens and folks need rush cons, if thay are better in long distance ? If cons are in cover no need to rush. For 15 muni tahy are good, maybe to good, but problem are with speed of throw. If axis side have argument that ppl dodge flame nade vs garnizone units, so dodge molotovs are more easy.
How cons are cheap, same price like grens, 3 model of cons = 60 mp, 2 model of grens = 60 mp, 5 model of cons = 100 mp, 3 model of grens = 90 mp. So answer me, if cons are cheap, grens must be cheap too ?
Really good are penals with falmer, riflman with bars and nades, some part of nades, but not lolotovs.
![avatar of skemshead](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 611
![avatar of Tiger Baron](/uploads/avatar/18099.jpg?updated=1687806793)
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
![avatar of Tobis](/uploads/avatar/10672.png?updated=1474330799)
![Senior Strategist Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_STRATEGIST.png)
![Donator 1](/images/badges/crowdfunding/donator_1.png)
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Molotovs are actually really good if you use them against charging squads while you´re in cover. Just drop it in front of you cover and wait til they burn or have to fall back.
Also if you don´t charge with squads into no cover to throw them they are really good. For 15 munnition they counter garrisons and also squads in cover if you´re in mid range combat. Soviets also have oraaah. You have to use your conscripts together to help each other and molotovs are only there to counter, what conscripts alone cannot. They were never meant to be strong as other grenades. They were mean to be cheap garrison/green cover counter that is used in conjuction with oraah and other conscripts.
I dunno they are still slow as shit and easy to dodge, with a non-negligible fuel cost.
I would like to see them buff the direct damage from the explosion from 10 -> 30, to keep it distinct from the volks incendiary nade which is quick and weaker.
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
130 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
11 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41662.870+14
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.299158.654+3
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
DZKdreamer
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM