Login

russian armor

Cromwell and Comet in the WBP

16 Dec 2016, 09:41 AM
#21
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243

Counterpart? the Panther? counter means that it destroy easily ...but..the panther struggle to kill anythink..cause of it slow rate of fire.

it can hunt him...but...in many cases the comet is fast enough to run away..
16 Dec 2016, 09:50 AM
#22
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Counterpart? the Panther? counter means that it destroy easily ...but..the panther struggle to kill anythink..cause of it slow rate of fire.

it can hunt him...but...in many cases the comet is fast enough to run away..


counter does mean that, "counter part" thou means that it closely resembles in faction and that is simply wrong.

Comet is good vs all types of targets while Panther is only good vs heavily armored targets.
16 Dec 2016, 11:10 AM
#23
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1096

UKF is a bit of a mess at the moment. Cromwell and Comet are literally holding it up in larger games.

Cromwell could probably take another slight nerf.

Comet is fine where it is. Especially when you look at the vet bonuses between the panther and the comet.
16 Dec 2016, 11:16 AM
#24
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Dec 2016, 11:10 AMGrim

Cromwell could probably take another slight nerf.


Better is set the same price MP/FU as PzIV.
16 Dec 2016, 14:34 PM
#25
avatar of tenid

Posts: 232

Why not just outright kill the Brits as an Army?


That's what those complaining about brits endlessly want. If it isn't the Comet or Cromwell, it'll be something else. They won't be happy until everything is as useful as the sexton.

What I always find funny in this discussion is that the Comet costing more than the Panther is rarely mentioned.
16 Dec 2016, 15:40 PM
#26
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1954

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Dec 2016, 11:16 AMAradan


Better is set the same price MP/FU as PzIV.


or set the MP/FU for the PzIV to the same as the Cromwell, since one of them badly underperforms for its price
16 Dec 2016, 16:28 PM
#27
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Dec 2016, 15:40 PMGrumpy


or set the MP/FU for the PzIV to the same as the Cromwell, since one of them badly underperforms for its price


Light vehicles need they time-window for shine. Too early tanks dont allow this.
16 Dec 2016, 16:58 PM
#28
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7



It's illusional that brits have no good mainline infantry. Sappers are more than any other faction can dream of in that regard.


Sappers are only good because of bad design. Givin 210MP infantry 2lmgs or zooks was never good idea.

Try using them once they get lmg and piat capped to one ;) They wont be thaat good
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 5
Brazil 5
unknown 3

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

761 users are online: 1 member and 760 guests
cfomantra
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49085
Welcome our newest member, cfomantra
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM