Login

russian armor

Replace the Jeep with Pershing.

Jeep buildable from HQ, Pershing added to the doctrine
Option Distribution Votes
68%
32%
Total votes: 69
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
29 Jun 2016, 07:30 AM
#1
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

Prequirement: Reduce the cost for OKW panzerfaust, remove the teching requirement.



Changes;
  • Move the jeep to USF HQ.
  • Add the Pershing to the Mechanized Company doctrine



Rationale:
  • In synergy with the concept of early game aggression and overall mobility.
  • Adding variety to the starting build order.
  • The pershing no longer limited to one doctrine only.



Before



After
29 Jun 2016, 07:34 AM
#2
avatar of medhood

Posts: 621

I think Easy 8s would be better with that Commander but eh
29 Jun 2016, 08:15 AM
#3
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

I can't believe I'm writing this but I actually like the idea
29 Jun 2016, 08:40 AM
#4
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 07:34 AMmedhood
I think Easy 8s would be better with that Commander but eh
But a pershing is better^_^
29 Jun 2016, 08:42 AM
#5
avatar of RealName

Posts: 276

Subtle touch with the smile on mech commander's face.

Though Pershing would be OP with Withdraw and refit. Pershing gonna die? Refund pls.
29 Jun 2016, 08:54 AM
#6
avatar of Blalord

Posts: 742 | Subs: 1

Subtle touch with the smile on mech commander's face.

Though Pershing would be OP with Withdraw and refit. Pershing gonna die? Refund pls.


Refund happen only when your vehicule "retreated" and left the map
29 Jun 2016, 09:02 AM
#7
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

Subtle touch with the smile on mech commander's face.

Though Pershing would be OP with Withdraw and refit. Pershing gonna die? Refund pls.

Obviously you didn't used this ability even once.
29 Jun 2016, 09:12 AM
#8
avatar of RealName

Posts: 276


Obviously you didn't used this ability even once.


Well no, I've only used it once when warspoils farming but I swear it gave me the resources instantly..

Mostly in games when I do use this commander (rarely) I never get the chance to withdraw my truck, coz it keeps getting schrecked. Prolly gonna use it more this patch.
29 Jun 2016, 09:30 AM
#9
avatar of Crumbum

Posts: 213

Voted ves because why not :snfPeter:
29 Jun 2016, 09:40 AM
#10
avatar of CartoonVillain

Posts: 474

This is actually a good idea.
29 Jun 2016, 09:57 AM
#11
avatar of stonebone000

Posts: 109

It's interesting but there's no "early game aggression" without the jeep. The jeep is an easy gg against okw and it can do work versus Wehrmacht. But it doesn't matter what anyone posts here. So have the worthless yes vote :]

Edit: I'm retarded and can't read
29 Jun 2016, 10:20 AM
#12
avatar of Pluralitas

Posts: 70

Rather e8, but pershing can work except it feels deja vu with mech doctrine
29 Jun 2016, 10:20 AM
#13
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

It might be worth getting then.
29 Jun 2016, 10:36 AM
#14
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

I like this. What price did hou have in mknd for the WC51?
29 Jun 2016, 10:36 AM
#15
avatar of Spin

Posts: 85

WC51 *WAS* the most overpowered USF start against OKW. I steamrolled OKW teams in 3v3 and 4v4 by denying any forward HQ setup and killing lots of squads. Now the WC51 is not great considering if OKW get any truck up anywhere, they are essentially useless.

Also wouldnt doing this swap make mechanised essentially a better commander overall? I think it's good as it is and the improvement if anything should be done in the M3 halftrack assult group which costs too much manpower to be effective. The arty is great vs OKW trucks and the recon uncounterable.
29 Jun 2016, 10:56 AM
#16
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

Wc51 to usf tech? Lets make them x100 times stronger for no reason.
29 Jun 2016, 10:57 AM
#17
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 10:36 AMSpin
WC51 *WAS* the most overpowered USF start against OKW. I steamrolled OKW teams in 3v3 and 4v4 by denying any forward HQ setup and killing lots of squads. Now the WC51 is not great considering if OKW get any truck up anywhere, they are essentially useless.

Also wouldnt doing this swap make mechanised essentially a better commander overall? I think it's good as it is and the improvement if anything should be done in the M3 halftrack assult group which costs too much manpower to be effective. The arty is great vs OKW trucks and the recon uncounterable.

This.
29 Jun 2016, 11:18 AM
#18
avatar of kitekaze

Posts: 378

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 10:56 AMFrost
Wc51 to usf tech? Lets make them x100 times stronger for no reason.


Still 100x times better than current mortar.
Hux
29 Jun 2016, 11:56 AM
#19
avatar of Hux
Patrion 14

Posts: 505

Voting yes.

This would actually have quite a good risk/reward ratio to it. So i'm voting yes.

More reworked commanders could definitely be a step in the right direction also

1.final balance tweaks/ bug fixes
2.Rework existing commanders
3.Optimisation (if any can be done)
29 Jun 2016, 16:07 PM
#20
avatar of GenObi

Posts: 556

I didnt think you ever going to have any good ideas but yes.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

877 users are online: 877 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49087
Welcome our newest member, samudrabet808
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM